"It's courageous and beneficial"
Yes, like I said - you attack nyms as cowards. Your view is invalid unless you sign it with your real name when you post. But how can one be certain this person named "Locke Amber" is real and not a bot? If only there was a license for proving identity... ah yes, a gov ID might work!
It's not that hard to extrapolate, seeing as digital IDs are an agenda point for wanna be masters. There's no need for us to agree, but you insisted I was wrong about your position, and repeatedly confirmed it after.
"The censor cannot gauge dissent due to anonymity" only sheep think it's important for their masters to know they do not agree with their policies.
You are rewriting history, brother - viruses have been claimed to exist way before 1930s and peoples forced to use mandated medicine against them. What is unscientific about demanding to be shown proof of existence of something you are using to scare people into accepting mass medicating as a viable remedy? Your argument about isolation is moot - there's the scientific method and also some good postulates which can be used for proving existence, and then there's fraud. The "spanish" vaccine adverse pandemic a hundred years ago is a great example of the entire nonsense field. So deadly, yet so impossible to infect healthy subjects when tried in experimental settings.
Modern genome gymnastics are more proof of the century long scam of virology. Finding everything in a soup of cell debris and then using computers to create a sequence from it which corellates to a sequence in a government approved gene bank is not science. You can look up Lanka's experiment and see that he has recreated virus particles the same as ones claimed by "isolations", by simply poisoning and starving cell cultures without mixing an infected sample.
Making people sick is a very lucrative biz, though, especially when you socialize your operating expenses.
"Privacy is important, but we’re talking about *public* posts. Ideas."
If you believe there is a public benefit to posting with your real name instead of a nym online you are several steps away from claiming we need digital IDs in order to have a voice online. This is the point you are making several times now, and claiming you are not or "lol, wtf" ing as if I write in a different language.
Ideas do not need to be signed with a government approved name to qualify for a discussion/debate.
The same fraudulent PCR test they used for Covid
The same one that gave 100% false positives in this incident in 2007
https://web.archive.org/web/20150605073534/https://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/22/health/22whoop.html
And the creator of that PCR test said “it’s not a diagnostic test at all”
Not sure if you've seen this one, it's quite old but a good docu about the HIV scam:
Making up new definitions for terms is the hallmark of propaganda/scams.
No virus has been isolated and shown to infect live cells and kill them. Instead, cell cultures are being starved and poisoned and the cell debris after are used as prove that a pathogenic virus has been at work. No controls are being done too, blatantly unscientific process.
Dr. Stefan Lanka has done the experiment to debunk this nonsense - without any supposedly pathogenic human sample, just by using the "standard" method and materials, he showed the same cell death as from so-called infected people. Difference is he did a control to show the cell death is in reality caused by the merhod itself.
Virology is pseudoscience and learned people knew this more than a century ago, plenty of written records, books and experiments about it, before the media and medicine became centralized scam industries.
" I’m talking about with respect to posting in the public square..."
Here it is. Playing the confus card is hilarious, though.
GFY, Elon bot.
Here it is again - "only oppinions and views of verified humans by government approved names should have any weight in public discourse."
"... you undermine the views you hold by being unwilling to stand by them."
This is the attack - portraying anonymity as cowardice. Fallacious argument through and through - an idea/opinion does not require a a government approved name and surname to be valid by itself.
Your point seems to be that anonymity should be discouraged so that censors are aware of dissent. I think all the murdered journalists, whistleblowers, Clinton associates and Epstein witnesses, and probably Assange as well would disagree.
Curious. Attacking anonymity by podcasters could be an attempt at creating the next global propaganda machine - only "real people" with a podcast to be allowed to critique the regime/status quo.
When they see a person, they should consider him saying the truth. In a sense, only those with a gov license for a podcast ... hello, Canada 😏
Looks like his short limit orders at $30k got filled. He's actually thanking them 😉
Bro really wore a tinfoil hat to disparage anyone who had valid concerns about the safety of this new technology that has no long-term safety data - at the same time the government was bragging about how much money it spent on "influencers" to shift public perception (aka propaganda)
https://twitter.com/PeterMcCormack/status/1387352979431383041
Pfizer McCuck ain't no real bitcoiner, nor does he give a fuck about freedom tech. He's mining his online clout for more slave bucks. Bad actor 100%, irregardless of hidden agenda or not
...one of the few countries where you would be sent to jail if you publicly expressed skepticism about the official holocoust narrative
Wow, almost as if the presence of resources which would allow a region to prosper without globalists always comes with unresolvable "local" conflicts...
People who think speakers on a media event are somehow important or representing the community should really be ashamed of themselves.
Works both ways, I'll be damned
I was insta blocked by him last year when he lost his mind with the Kiev circus - it became clear to me what a terrible statist he was, along with that Gladstein fella from the HRF.
Credit where it's due for accomplishments, but I cannot fathom what cognitive diss he must experience as this nonsense is totally backwards to the Bitcoin ethos.
nostr:note1x84l3gv6nlzjwcelw5wp0nepcjp320yp5j9qq2uncac5t7e0qafqgf67ajI gotta say he excells at his job, if we agree it is to gaslight the public 😎
Unfortunately one of the bigger disapointments in the community.
Or a man with an agenda... increase the supply, really?
A deflationary fiat currency, especially in an inflationary paradigm, will lead to lower exports and loss of political control of a welfare state, also destroying the welfare state. There's for sure more negatives for the current system, but the idea is that regimes have no choice but to keep printing.