gm nostr
Today I'm listening to a band I learned about from an OP_RETURN. π€
vibe
#m=image%2Fjpeg&dim=474x355&blurhash=%23BHKhjF%7C00i%5Dkp%5ElOB9Zo%7Duh%3FI8_9DjqtR%25MWZRj9a%25gbV8%5Et8t%2CsqRjNG4Txa.TIUnOx%5EShs.rq0JIA%3FH%3FbNJM%7Ds%3BxYjD%3D%7EVsE0yC%25NR8RPk6R%24sFi%7CoytkVsMxkVWBRj&x=5112e0f1d7fc9c7ef5b80d86d12eb8516203469c76b61e5fc25f95d26fda9b31
If true, we are overdue for the next one.
Love seeing people get ecash pilled. π§‘
Boobtube is another popular site with bird videos.
#m=image%2Fjpeg&dim=600x902&blurhash=%5EAECRd%3Fb8wH%3Bxv.T-oxvI%3AVsjEfl4ma0%25hxvM%7BIU9aR5t7yEs9RO%3FFXTIUVspJo%23-pWXf7RiWAx%5DtQRPt7XTMxocITS5t7jEo%23RPIoaeSho%7Dn%24Vs&x=d922a360ef5a867018eda9d3fb7497895c1be3d05be39ffce5a0042994140910
My daughter just showed me this cool math trick she can do with her fingers. She can multiply any number by 7 and get the wrong answer.
π€£π€£π€£
Where can I learn more about these trustless relay interpolation signatures?
#m=image%2Fjpeg&dim=700x940&blurhash=_LF5%5De.7009ZjKaKjc%7D%40%24*J-tljrVsV%400dj%5EoI%24%2Boxo%23k8KjS%7Dv%7DQ-WFgMo%23aKWA%25Na%7Cj%40S0Rko%7DxuoHjIbYxbadw0jFo%7DtkM%7Bs9og%24*RPNftkjbV%40oMShogV%3FRQW%3Bj%5Dt6&x=23adf479c91533537c1ab31ad44558012ec4a75133474dd72c8ee6d4827f50dfThis was the line of code that inspired my original note:
!!(resource.comment ?? '').match(/^fee for/i) &&
I just pasted it into chatGPT (plus the conditional on the following line which I have left out for privacy) and got a detailed explanation of all the little javascript hacks you can see here. I am new to javascript so it's a great way to get up to speed.
This is easy mode. There is a lot more subtlety in using chatGPT to write new code. You have to get good at being really explicit and including all the relevant requirements and context. Even then it can be super frustrating. You have to discern when you are asking the wrong questions or asking it something it can't help you with. Keep in mind it is just regurgitating the accumulated knowledge of publicly available data. If your problem is in a niche domain, or uses special tools and methods, or if the project you are working on significantly departs from standard practice it will be less helpful. I have found it is much weaker with rust, for example. Probably because rust is more complex to reason about and the rust community is a tiny fraction of the size of the javascript community.
Overall it's a great learning aid to add to your toolbox. IMO the doomsayers are way off base. LLMs will only replace shitty developers. :)
LLMs are a magic wand for understanding super dense code πͺ
There is not an algorithm. Organic growth only. I wish I had more helpful advice. π€· I think a lot of people are trying to solve this problem also.