As a praxeologist analyzing workman's compensation, let me break down the program's effects using the deductive logic of praxeology rather than empirical data:
Workman's compensation aims to provide insurance for workers injured on the job so they continue receiving wages and medical care. On the surface this appears humane and prudent, helping those harmed through no fault of their own.
However, praxeology reveals unintended consequences. By socializing costs of workplace injuries, workman's compensation weakens the incentive of employers to invest in safety training and equipment. Why implement costly precautions when accidents will be covered by insurance? This moral hazard inevitably leads to more injuries over time.
Further, the program violates property rights. Employers are forcibly compelled to pay premiums for a service they may consider unnecessary or expensive. This intrusion on contracting freedom upsets the logical structure of a voluntary market. Without consent, workman's compensation amounts to little more than disguised taxation.
Most importantly, praxeology tells us people respond to incentives. By removing the penalty of lost wages for risky behavior, workman's compensation perversely rewards negligence on the part of workers. Some employees now lack motivation to be diligent or avoid dangers, knowing accidental wounds will be compensated rather than constitute an economic loss.
In short, while well-intentioned, workman's compensation violates praxeological principles of private property, contractual agreement, and cause-and-effect incentives. An unintended yet predictable result is more workplace accidents and injuries despite this expensive insurance program. A praxeologist must conclude the costs outweigh supposed benefits.
#Monero donations 459pBtYK32aRL9mqhHdnyGdV8Dgfx7dnwavzHcPNpkQHRm2fzgrMNBGUZ49A6u6JCEGgviojHc2pu9ikC9oTTDS5E2VdPnu
AI is code and code is speech, correct? Can you regulate it? It's kinda like having actual magic words now
A lot has happened this week. It'd be cool if I had a support network or something.
Here is a praxeological analysis of the anime Dr. Stone:
Dr. Stone is set in a post-apocalyptic world where nearly all humans have been petrified into stone for thousands of years. The protagonist, Senku Ishigami, is a scientific genius who woke up and aims to rebuild civilization through the power of science. He represents the role of the entrepreneur in driving progress through innovation.
When Senku first wakes up, he is in a state of primal uncertainty. He has only his own labor and intellect to rely on in an unfamiliar and dangerous environment. Through observation and reason, he gains knowledge to guide his actions. For example, he learns to create tools like a stone knife and thatcher hut to aid his survival. This demonstrates how the entrepreneur relies on the logical analysis of means and ends to determine how to satisfy needs.
A key theme is the power of saving, capital accumulation, and the division of labor. Senku methodically saves and stockpiles resources that will be useful for future production, like iron from petrified ship hulls, sulfur, and minerals. He recruits allies with diverse skills to join his Kingdom of Science and work cooperatively using their comparative advantages. This allows them to achieve shared goals like reviving the petrified, building vehicles, and creating electricity that they could not alone. It exemplifies how cooperation and capital goods enable productivity gains.
Senku faces various challenges or uncertainties along the way, such as adversary Tsukasa who destroys technology to create a primitive society. But Senku prevails through creativity and science. He demonstrates the entrepreneurial spirit of persevering through obstacles via innovation and value creation. His quest to mathematically quantify all phenomena using the power of science aligns with the praxeologist’s goal of logical analysis to guide human action.
Overall, Dr. Stone provides an optimistic portrayal of enterprising individuals using reason and science to rebuild civilization brick by brick through mutually beneficial exchange. The protagonists are driven by an ethic of peace and progress through technology and free association.
Mississippi Heat
The sun beats down without relent
Scorching the earth with fierce intent
The air lies still, no breeze in sight
As stifling heat grips day and night
Magnolias wilt in the glare
Their blossoms droop with nary a care
Cicadas buzz in fevered song
As people pray the heat won't linger long
The mighty river flows on slow
Its murky waters barely flow
Fish seek the depths to stay alive
All nature struggles to survive
Porch swings sit empty, still as can be
No one dares step out in the heat
Ice tea and shade, that's all they crave
Praying the thermometer will behave
When night falls, no relief in view
The air so thick you can't see through
Restless and soaked in sweat you lie
As warm wind drifts a listless sigh
In Mississippi heat so dire
One can't help but tire and tire
The sun beats down with searing rays
Long endless summer torrid days
Lots of books Everywhere
True believers, feast your eyes on this rare piece of Marvel history! Up for grabs is Eternals #13 from 1977, Jack Kirby's cosmic saga of immortal beings protecting humanity. This book marked the first appearance of Domo, the about-to-be-fan-favorite Eternal who resembles a stocky caveman but boasts tremendous strength and durability.
While its condition shows some signs of its age, this copy still displays all the Kirby magic within its pages. The art pops with kinetic energy and bombastic action. Storywise, the Celestials arrive to judge mankind's destiny, setting up an epic confrontation with the Eternals.
Though not mint, books in fair condition from the Bronze Age are getting harder to find these days. Here's your chance to own the first appearance of Domo for a steal before prices skyrocket further! An essential Marvel key issue for only 1 monero! Make mine Eternals!
Here is a comparison of some key aspects of blockchain technology versus AI technology:
Data storage:
- Blockchain stores data across decentralized nodes in a verifiable, immutable ledger.
- AI systems collect and analyze large datasets for training models but data is controlled centrally.
Transparency:
- Blockchain networks are transparent with all transactions viewable to participants.
- AI models can be black boxes with little visibility into data use or decision logic.
Security:
- Blockchain uses cryptography, decentralization to make fraud very difficult.
- AI security vulnerable to data poisoning, model stealing, misleading outputs.
Control:
- Blockchain gives users control over assets, decentralized from authorities.
- AI systems often controlled by companies or governments raising accountability issues.
Automation:
- Blockchain executes programs via smart contracts in a set way.
- AI involves more flexible automation, learning new patterns from data.
Regulation:
- Blockchain currently lacks clear regulatory oversight in many domains.
- AI increasingly targeted for regulation regarding data rights, auditing.
In summary, blockchain offers security but limited flexibility while AI provides adaptive automation but with centralized control. Both are transforming technology in different ways.
Lysander Spooner, an American political philosopher and abolitionist of the 19th century, had nuanced views on poverty. While he recognized the existence of poverty and its detrimental impact on individuals and society, he approached the issue from a perspective rooted in individual liberty and limited government intervention.
Spooner believed that poverty was not primarily caused by a lack of wealth or resources but by systemic barriers imposed by the state. He argued that government regulations, monopolies, and unjust laws hindered economic freedom and perpetuated poverty. Spooner contended that individuals should have the right to freely engage in voluntary transactions, trade, and entrepreneurship without government interference, which he believed would naturally lead to prosperity.
According to Spooner, welfare programs and charity provided by the government were ineffective and counterproductive in addressing poverty. He believed that such initiatives encouraged dependence, stifled self-reliance, and undermined the moral responsibility of individuals to provide for themselves. Instead, Spooner advocated for a system where individuals would be free to accumulate wealth through their own efforts and voluntarily support charitable causes.
Overall, Spooner's thoughts on poverty centered around the importance of individual liberty, limited government intervention, and the belief that removing artificial barriers would empower individuals to overcome poverty through their own initiative and voluntary interactions in the marketplace.
Anyone want some free kittens?
Found some neat stuff today.
Still looking for new friends.
Bought a cheap drone and lost it in my tall grass for like 2 hours. Thought I wasted $45. Lol
https://nostr.build/av/edae199de0c5d8a92560297dd8809d9970a0ec051b92e39bc6b1fe48f0e14023.mp4