Love it, it tastes better than you would think in coffee with some butter.
I mentioned this line of argument to lots of my liberal/progressive friends and they laughed in my face. Like our government doesnβt do bio-warfare or something π
Itβs not like Blackrock is gonna let anyone withdraw it π
Got lucky on the scam pump 
GM #coffeechain 
Marxβs actual thought is Left, and I think honestly adjacent to Bitcoin but we can discuss that a different time and others can feel free to yell at me here if they want π
The βMarxistβ ideology that spread from his thought was not Left. Communism is definitely not Left, especially the Stalinist strains. Stalinism was a right wing (basically fascist) counterrevolution against the emergence of decentralized peasant revolution in what would become the USSR.
All of their rhetoric was from the βLeftβ or what we call the βLeftβ now. Almost none of their actions supported their rhetoric. Just like the establishment Dems in my opinion.
And I threw this quote up in a note yesterday in response to one of nostr:npub1t3ggcd843pnwcu6p4tcsesd02t5jx2aelpvusypu5hk0925nhauqjjl5g4 βs notes but it fits this discussion so Iβll use it again:
βBetween the newly ordained Jesuit, the young Marxist, the fresh staff officer, Enarque or MBA, there is no appreciable difference. All five are dominated by method and each of their methods arises from a common source. Appearances suggest that there must be some serious differences among them, since they regularly do battle with each other on behalf of their countries or professions. The differences must lie, therefore, in the content which they subject to their universal method.
Or perhaps their rivalry is the result of their respective interests which, if the ferocity of their battles tells us anything, differ greatly. Yet when you examine these differences or the content involved or even their respective interests, you search in vain for any remarkable contradictions. All that separates them are the positions they occupy. They defend the structural interests assigned to them by their system. And even then, if you remove the screen of ideology, the ends they seek are pretty much of a kind.β
Saul, John Ralston. Voltaire's Bastards (p. 108). Free Press. Kindle Edition.
Establishment Dems are corporatist fascists. And to be honest I would lump communists and Marxists into the corporatist camp too because there is very little difference between them and the other corporatists across the political aisle.
They are rhetorical socialists at best, then they abandon it as soon as they are elected
Again, you didnβt answer my question lol
ππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππ
You didnβt answer my question π
#memes 
Who is the βleftβ your are talking about here? If you mean AOC you are ridiculously wrong
Itβs actually the liberals that co-opted the far left terms and rhetoric. Not the other way around. There are no Marxist or socialist liberals. They use it as a rhetorical mask. Same way there arenβt many real capitalists in corporate America, they are mostly bureaucrats who call themselves capitalists
Itβs the left that believes those things. Not liberals
The liberals were never actually against war, just wars they didnβt start themselves.
Thanks! There is a lot of bee and wasp propaganda out there lol
I didnβt say it was, just that it sounded like it was β
Also, were the waffles good? β



