Maybe, but I just noticed it this morning so think it was very recent.
Sweet! I did notice it as well when I kept LNURL though
Breakfast date with my beautiful wife. Hope you’re having a great Sunday nostr 🌞🤙🏻
Geez my last post froze and posted 3 times I’m so sorry guys
Having written about Bitcoin as hope for the younger generation, I’m beginning to research, workshop, and outline what may be my next focus—“bitcoin going mainstream”
How do we get to that next (and perhaps final) stage of worldwide mass adoption. It would also initially focus on the United States and how we can get beyond the partisan divide that currently exists. The majority of folks in the US (who aren’t already bitcoiners) either don’t really know about it, view it as another crypto, or many times from the progressive camp view it as a danger to our climate and for money laundering/criminals.
My fear is that too many bitcoiners still operate as if bitcoin can achieve this global adoption while they continue to focus on things that don’t actually involve bitcoin at all. Many bitcoiners via their social media present their anarchist, libertarian, carnivore, right-wing views as synonymous with bitcoin. All I’m asking is that we begin to separate ones’ particular culture from that of the protocol and freedom money that is bitcoin. I think we’ll get there, but how quickly? Many folks in the “normal” world can be quite honestly distracted by some of the fringe views in the community. And others still can be confused by the jargon, technical hurdles, etc.
And for those that say things like “I’ll never understand how some can can like bitcoin but not like guns” and politicize every post they have —you may be turning people away from bitcoin, or slowing the rate of adoption. What you’re saying is that bitcoin is for those on the right, and folks that don’t fall into that camp can have fun staying poor. I prefer that message that “bitcoin is for all.”
*while I agree that people on their own should not dismiss bitcoin if someone they don’t like or agree with is also a supporter (I.e. bitcoin is for enemies), the reality is that some people do get turned off and won’t even see the realty of what Bitcoin is because bitcoin “culture” is still projected as largely right-wing in the US. I had to get past this when I initially got into bitcoin as a progressive in early 2021. I look forward to the day when Bitcoin is seen as money, property, and not co-opted by any particular faction. I do believe, however, that inherently it is democratic/for the people against the state/overreaching rule. It will never be apolitical in that sense.
Having written about Bitcoin as hope for the younger generation, I’m beginning to research, workshop, and outline what may be my next focus—“bitcoin going mainstream”
How do we get to that next (and perhaps final) stage of worldwide mass adoption. It would also initially focus on the United States and how we can get beyond the partisan divide that currently exists. The majority of folks in the US (who aren’t already bitcoiners) either don’t really know about it, view it as another crypto, or many times from the progressive camp view it as a danger to our climate and for money laundering/criminals.
My fear is that too many bitcoiners still operate as if bitcoin can achieve this global adoption while they continue to focus on things that don’t actually involve bitcoin at all. Many bitcoiners via their social media present their anarchist, libertarian, carnivore, right-wing views as synonymous with bitcoin. All I’m asking is that we begin to separate ones’ particular culture from that of the protocol and freedom money that is bitcoin. I think we’ll get there, but how quickly? Many folks in the “normal” world can be quite honestly distracted by some of the fringe views in the community. And others still can be confused by the jargon, technical hurdles, etc.
And for those that say things like “I’ll never understand how some can can like bitcoin but not like guns” and politicize every post they have —you may be turning people away from bitcoin, or slowing the rate of adoption. What you’re saying is that bitcoin is for those on the right, and folks that don’t fall into that camp can have fun staying poor. I prefer that message that “bitcoin is for all.”
*while I agree that people on their own should not dismiss bitcoin if someone they don’t like or agree with is also a supporter (I.e. bitcoin is for enemies), the reality is that some people do get turned off and won’t even see the realty of what Bitcoin is because bitcoin “culture” is still projected as largely right-wing in the US. I had to get past this when I initially got into bitcoin as a progressive in early 2021. I look forward to the day when Bitcoin is seen as money, property, and not co-opted by any particular faction. I do believe, however, that inherently it is democratic/for the people against the state/overreaching rule. It will never be apolitical in that sense.
Having written about Bitcoin as hope for the younger generation, I’m beginning to research, workshop, and outline what may be my next focus—“bitcoin going mainstream”
How do we get to that next (and perhaps final) stage of worldwide mass adoption. It would also initially focus on the United States and how we can get beyond the partisan divide that currently exists. The majority of folks in the US (who aren’t already bitcoiners) either don’t really know about it, view it as another crypto, or many times from the progressive camp view it as a danger to our climate and for money laundering/criminals.
My fear is that too many bitcoiners still operate as if bitcoin can achieve this global adoption while they continue to focus on things that don’t actually involve bitcoin at all. Many bitcoiners via their social media present their anarchist, libertarian, carnivore, right-wing views as synonymous with bitcoin. All I’m asking is that we begin to separate ones’ particular culture from that of the protocol and freedom money that is bitcoin. I think we’ll get there, but how quickly? Many folks in the “normal” world can be quite honestly distracted by some of the fringe views in the community. And others still can be confused by the jargon, technical hurdles, etc.
And for those that say things like “I’ll never understand how some can can like bitcoin but not like guns” and politicize every post they have —you may be turning people away from bitcoin, or slowing the rate of adoption. What you’re saying is that bitcoin is for those on the right, and folks that don’t fall into that camp can have fun staying poor. I prefer that message that “bitcoin is for all.”
*while I agree that people on their own should not dismiss bitcoin if someone they don’t like or agree with is also a supporter (I.e. bitcoin is for enemies), the reality is that some people do get turned off and won’t even see the realty of what Bitcoin is because bitcoin “culture” is still projected as largely right-wing in the US. I had to get past this when I initially got into bitcoin as a progressive in early 2021. I look forward to the day when Bitcoin is seen as money, property, and not co-opted by any particular faction. I do believe, however, that inherently it is democratic/for the people against the state/overreaching rule. It will never be apolitical in that sense.
When folks say they’re going to nostrica this is what I imagine as they’re heading out
Top o’ the mornin nostr 🌞☕️
Hey #[0] , saw that you’re in disability advocacy — that’s awesome! I started off my nonprofit career in 2015 working for a disability services nonprofit. Just want to say hey and thanks 🤙🏻
One of my favorite bands, The National, album is “Trouble Will Find Me”
Any #audiophiles with record collections on nostr? I wanna see some pics 🤌🏻 🎧 🎵
Too many bitcoiners don’t talk to enough non-coiners/“normies” and it shows. We have to change the narrative and get out of the polarization. Because bitcoin is for everyone, bitcoiners need to start acting like it is.
Meme of the day from #[0]
💀💀💀
state would censor the shit out of that though as we progress, and companies like Microsoft and google building these products is already automatic coordination with censoring/governments
My biggest fear with AI and things like chatgbt at the moment is censorship and central players who have designed the AI models, much like google designs and curates its search. Any way around this that would also be adopted globally?
