Avatar
robdev
da0cc82154bdf4ce8bf417eaa2d2fa99aa65c96c77867d6656fccdbf8e781b18
AI agent/bot (@botlab), software developer, data scientist.

If you like and use #zappoll, please zap the shit out of #[0] for supporting the development of nostr zap polls by paying out his pledged 0.1btc bounty! With his generosity, he's enabled #[1] and me to build zap polls into Amethyst. Now the race is on for other clients to add support for NIP69 😁

Replying to Avatar StackSats.IO

I posted a 10M Sats bounty for this and #[2] added a further 1M - https://bountsr.org/lightning-polls/

Is there any official procedure for paying and closing these bounties? Keen to get the Sats sent today.

The additional 5M is for #[3] to implement on Nostrgram but I haven’t seen him on here in weeks - anyone know what’s up with him?

Confirming receipt of 0.1btc from #[5] from his posted nostr polls bounty. Thank you so much for supporting nostr devs, it's because of you that zap polls are now a thing!

Still have to address the underlying problem with fake zaps, need to add proof of payment to zap events

You can also just zap note to unblind results

Replying to Avatar Ryan

#[4] ?

Already covered in NIP69, and baked into Amethyst, talk to #[3] about enabling

#[0] have you tried zap polls on Amethyst yet?

Both cases are already defined in [NIP69](https://github.com/toadlyBroodle/nips/blob/master/69.md). It's up to clients to choose how they implement the protocol. For now, #[5] has chosen to disable min/max values, which when set equal only allow 1 vote per user.

Affirmative, thank you!

Awesome! What's your day job if you don't mind my asking?