Yeah, its like zapathon.
It was fun, for a bit. I've moved on.
Chamomile, so far, but orange ginger up next.
I'm done following newbies.
I follow and zap them, they don't follow me back, and they are never seen or heard from again.
I'm going to wait for them to prove themselves by being active. And I'm going to dump the dead fish I've already collected.
Same. Trying to ward off some virus with some extreme chillaxing.
Hmm. That's interesting. Never considered that.
Yes, the people I find most confusing seem to be the ones who end up being underhanded. Like, they feign friendship, while complaining about you to the boss.
I like when people are congruent.
That's part of working in quality assurance and auditing. 😁
Feels a bit like being the court jester.
What autistic people struggle with is in not allowing for anomalies in a pattern, which implies that people are chained to a pattern of behavior and have no free will.
We begrudge people the right to be an exception.
Stereotypes are patterns, not laws, and the exceptions help you hone your understanding of those patterns. As if you had a massive state-cycle diagram in your head and it becomes increasingly complex over time.
I think that being able to balance those two concepts can lead to a bit of an autistic superpower. Being able to see the patterns, while maintaining disbelief.
Same. Hit the ceiling.
I struggle to read faces, sometimes, but I'm always amazed how much most people take no notice of.
Glaring, comically-obvious behavioral patterns strike most people as individual, random choices, so human behavior seems more chaotic and independent to them, then it really is.
Perhaps we are merely better at pattern-recognition in human affairs because we spend so much time trying to comprehend and predict the behavior of the people around us.
We are set a bit apart and carefully observing, so we notice things.
These people don't want us to breed.
Our offspring and potential offspring are the carbon they're trying to reduce.
There is no shame in organic human reproduction.
Once you've seen the rampant anti-natalism of our modern beauty standards, you can't ever unsee it.
Have your lips and your arse plumped up, so that men can't help but think of sodomy, when they look at you.
Can't get pregnant doing that.
💯 safe from the risks of motherhood.
Hide or cut off the boobs,
starve down the hips,
chop off the mane,
scrape off your delicately arched brows and draw them back on as manly squares.
Have your buccal fat removed and your tummy tucked.
Shave your head, but not your legs.
You are unusually well-informed, sir.
I am duly impressed.
#m=image%2Fgif&dim=1400x788&blurhash=iC9%25bgf%2BADo%7D%7EBxu57NG-pr%3FxaJ8tRa0%252XSM%7Bn%25NGofxat7ozWBs%3AxtWBNbR%2Br%3FMyS2V%40RPoLWBIUWBoLRjWVayxuofWB&x=22d8dc354f95fdf61515ac2510815f64e85bca96868b5c82b9c172fb392122a8
Hmmm. I think mothering has gone out of style and we all have to hide the evidence of our shame, now.
Many people in the past have been female and gone on to lead happy, productive lives.
Some of them even reproduced.
Few know this.
There is no shame in having two X chromosomes.
I therefore see the anti-breast movement (because that's what it is) as a part of the larger anti-natal movement that is driving the transgender beauty ideal.
It's all part of the insididous Culture of Death.
Women with full breasts tend to be mothers or women who will become mothers.
Mothers are bad. Throw rocks at them.