Those IMF and WB loans come with many destructive strings attached, including the forfeiture of sovereign assets. I'm sure El Salvador could raise that kind of capital purely through crowd funding from the broader BTC community, and there would be no conditions other than honest spending. They could even borrow against their current BTC stash.
The other plant food is Sunshine. That's why professor Dr. Bill Gates, the greatest scientist and philanthropist in the world wants to save us all by blocking out sunlight.
Sadly, corporate empires headed by the likes of high priests Saylor and Fink are ensuring that the spirituality is retained on Wallstreet. Our own greed has sullied Bitcoin's potential. Oh well - might as well just enjoy number-go-up, and not worry too much about the wars in other people's countries.
Extracting GOLD from used phones
https://video.nostr.build/43b396c82c68d0eacc8fcc8e2acc176dcd540b3a87f845057f255efa1ca55488.mp4
And they say Bitcoin mining is energy intensive.
Zero! It's going to zero!
I'm struggling to keep up with the 100k parties. Do we have to party every time BTC goes downward through 100k as well as up?
The top one? Really? It's just one ugly heap of ostentation. You couldn't force me to live there.
Low liquidity Luno... catching up.
Is anyone auditing MSTR's Bitcoin holding? Every time they buy a ton of them, the price seems to go down. I have zero trust for anyone on Wallstreet, including Mr. Saylor, who seems to have reached God status among the screaming number-go-up groupies. Does he publish addresses, and proof that they are owned by MSTR?
And the insane cheering on of the corporate accumulation has me baffled. In the excitement of number-go-up, the Bitcoin community (whatever that is) seems to have lost sight of the original intention and philosophy of Bitcoin. With every purchase by Blackrock or Saylor boy, Bitcoin becomes less freedom tech and more just a clever digital asset for Wallstreet and the parasite class to use as leverage in their old game.
I have a strong aversion to highlighting and underlining in books. The author took the trouble to write the whole book, not just a few clever sentences surrounded by a whole lot of useless padding (your note confirms this). Furthermore, any highlighting by one person renders the book unreadable by anyone else. Highlighting is subjective.
How often have you referred back to a book that you've read with a highlighter?
Once you've had good biltong, you'll never do that again!
How did they manage the swap? Did you respond to a one-time pin request?
Ok, I cheated. I see you've recently quoted "Economics in one lesson"... which I haven't read yet ;-)
It sounds like Ayne Rand's Atlas Shrugged.
