e7
nobody
e7eb4e8f9cbf1e5cd26b81f73a95d065f94380e0d85842303d782fc67e59bcc9
account deleted

Most of these ETFs hold their bitcoin at Coinbase so Coinbase would have to collude with the ETFs to be fractional reserve. Unlikely IMO

Im actually glad Blackrock does not self-custody. They are holding their bitcoin at Coinbase so I have at least some faith their ETF is backed by actual bitcoin. But there always is a chance of fuckery going on.

Lots of dollar/bitcoin price volatility, but this is the what is most important.

It’s because few would buy a share if it were priced at the bitcoin price of $43k.

And it were say 1/1000th of the bitcoin price, the correlation would eventually diverge because of the management fee.

It’s the same as GLD or SPY. Those ETFs are not priced at exactly the same level as gold or the S&P 500.

This is really important if you are concerned about the bitcoin price in the short run. Because of the ridiculous 1.5% management fee, there is going to be mass dumping of GBTC shares (which represent 600k+ bitcoin) and Grayscale as I understand it will then have to redeem large amounts of shares and sell the bitcoin representing those shares.

My guess is most of the GBTC holders will buy bitcoin or another ETF with lower fees, but there may be a time lag and some GBTC holders may not invest back into bitcoin at all. nostr:note1hchem5eyr8mtyngp0vre376vnkux54yct7al0wzc9v94pe7mahmsh4nelk

nostr:npub1excellx58e497gan6fcsdnseujkjm7ym5yp3m4rp0ud4j8ss39js2pn72a has a history of ridiculous forecasts and I’m 99.9% sure this will be another one.

An increase in the bitcoin market cap of the GDP of the US in “days/weeks”? Cmon man.

Markets almost always do what people expect it not to do in the short run.

“Although bitcoin could go up to $20,000, it can go to $30,000. It’s on its way to zero — somewhere between zero and 200. It’s a utility token for criminals, terrorists, money launderers, tax evaders — they’ll always find some use for it. So it might not go all the way to zero. It’s clearly a bubble — it looks like the second biggest bubble in history after tulip mania.”

Jim Rickards, December 2017

Yes. He knows a lot about a lot but I don’t think he really ever got bitcoin. That is part of the reason he promoted Doge coin and also why he proclaimed himself “Diamond hands” in reference to bitcoin and then proceeded to sell most of Teslas bitcoin.

Dear #Nostr community,

Today, I want to address a critical issue that’s been on my mind and on the minds of many in our decentralized world: the hypothetical scenario where app stores decide to ban all on-ramps to #Nostr apps.

This situation poses significant questions about the future of decentralized platforms, the role of major app stores, and the resilience of the #Nostr community in the face of censorship (which we probably will see in the 2024 elections).

If app stores were to ban #Nostr apps, the immediate impact could be a barrier for average users to access these platforms through the most common channels (e.g Apple App Store & Google Play Store)

This move could be seen as an attempt to curtail the reach of decentralized networks, influenced by various factors including regulatory pressures, content concerns, or even competitive motives from centralized entities. The tech giants want to maintain their monopolies.

However, the decentralized ethos of #Nostr is not one to back down in the face of such challenges. Alternative methods of accessing #Nostr, such as sideloading apps from websites or using other, more open app stores, would likely become more prevalent.

This situation would not only test but also potentially strengthen the community’s commitment to decentralization, privacy, and freedom of expression.

From a game theory perspective, this scenario presents an intriguing interplay of actions and reactions.

App Stores would have to balance their policies with the potential backlash and the growing demand for decentralized applications.

Users might be divided between those who find alternative ways to access #Nostr and those who are deterred by the additional steps required.

Developers could be incentivized to innovate and create more robust methods for distributing their apps, thus promoting an even more resilient decentralized ecosystem.

The Silver Lining …

While a ban from app stores can be seen as a setback, it could also serve as a catalyst for growth and awareness.

Such a move would bring into sharp focus the importance of decentralizing not just our platforms but also the means of accessing them.

It could spark a larger conversation about digital rights, censorship, and the role of major corporations in our digital lives.

As we navigate these challenges, it’s crucial to remember that the strength of #Nostr lies in its community and the shared belief in a decentralized future.

Let’s continue to support each other, explore alternative access methods, and stand united for the principles of decentralization, privacy, and free speech.

Let’s embrace this challenge as a chance to innovate, grow, and show the resilience of our community.

Stay humble and stack sats,

Mason

Please comment. I realize I don’t know what I don’t know. This is an open discussion around the principles of decentralization and free speech and I want to learn more.

This will be really important once Nostr gets bigger and more influential in the world as there are forces out there who hate not having control of information. I’m technologically challenged and just hope smart people can figure out how the world can use Nostr censorship free and without permission.

You may be right. I usually dont include the lost bitcoin in the value the network. I understand there is a possibility it may be worth several $trillion this year as well, especially if this ETF demand does start pouring in.

Has anyone heard anything from Nick

Szabo? I always thought he was either Satoshi or in a group of folks who were Satoshi.