Do you prefer wasabi? Or any thoughts on coinjoining in general, would love your 2 cents as a neutral party!
Maybe #[4]ā can win his mempool never clearing bet now
Got it, so if I hypothetically mixed 50 times, Iād be paying 50 mining fees?
But I guess I may not need that many remixes because the pools are larger in wasabi compared to whirlpoolā¦
Running #Sparrow within a container using VanillaOS.org.
First download Sparrow:
```
$ wget https://github.com/sparrowwallet/sparrow/releases/download/1.7.3/sparrow-1.7.3-1.x86_64.rpm
$ wget https://github.com/sparrowwallet/sparrow/releases/download/1.7.3/sparrow-1.7.3-manifest.txt.asc
$ wget https://github.com/sparrowwallet/sparrow/releases/download/1.7.3/sparrow-1.7.3-manifest.txt
```
Now cryptographically prove the download:
```
$ curl https://keybase.io/craigraw/pgp_keys.asc | gpg --import
$ gpg --verify sparrow-1.7.3-manifest.txt.asc
$ shasum --check sparrow-1.7.3-manifest.txt --ignore-missing
```
Now install Sparrow within a container:
```
$ apx run --apt sudo mkdir /usr/share/desktop-directories
$ apx install --apt ./Downloads/sparrow_1.7.3-1_amd64.deb
$ apx export --apt sparrow
```
Done. #Linuxš§
Thatās cool. Do you know any ways to do containers on Mint?
I think my main question is around wasabi and their relationship with some chain surveillance firm(s). As I understand, they run your utxo by the chain surveillance firm before allowing you into the mix. I donāt have any illicit funds, but isnt this in a way flagging my utxo (which may be a kyc purchase, so in essence flagging my identity) to chain surveillance that I am a coinjoiner.
I understand they would be able to figure that out even if I used whirlpool, but they would have had to actively try to find my specific utxo vs being served a list of all coinjoiners by the coordinator.
If the above isnāt much of a concern, then I certainly like the idea of no toxic change and also the idea of being able to coinjoin any amount.
Also not sure I understand some of the arguments around which protocol is easier for a chain surveillance firm to monitor via leaving some of their own sats remixing in the pools.
I think my main question is around wasabi and their relationship with some chain surveillance firm(s). As I understand, they run your utxo by the chain surveillance firm before allowing you into the mix. I donāt have any illicit funds, but isnt this in a way flagging my utxo (which may be a kyc purchase, so in essence flagging my identity) to chain surveillance that I am a coinjoiner.
I understand they would be able to figure that out even if I used whirlpool, but they would have had to actively try to find my specific utxo vs being served a list of all coinjoiners by the coordinator.
If the above isnāt much of a concern, then I certainly like the idea of no toxic change and also the idea of being able to coinjoin any amount.
Also not sure I understand some of the arguments around which protocol is easier for a chain surveillance firm to monitor via leaving some of their own sats remixing in the pools.
I think my main question is around wasabi and their relationship with some chain surveillance firm(s). As I understand, they run your utxo by the chain surveillance firm before allowing you into the mix. I donāt have any illicit funds, but isnt this in a way flagging my utxo (which may be a kyc purchase, so in essence flagging my identity) to chain surveillance that I am a coinjoiner.
I understand they would be able to figure that out even if I used whirlpool, but they would have had to actively try to find my specific utxo vs being served a list of all coinjoiners by the coordinator.
If the above isnāt much of a concern, then I certainly like the idea of no toxic change and also the idea of being able to coinjoin any amount.
Also not sure I understand some of the arguments around which protocol is easier for a chain surveillance firm to monitor via leaving some of their own sats remixing in the pools.
As a non technical coinjoin user, conversations like this really make it hard to decide whether coinjoining makes sense or not. Seems like both sides of the wasabi/whirlpool debate are positive youāre screwed if you use the other one.
You should read about gene therapy and learn more about what it is. You know how as bitcoiners itās frustrating when we hear uninformed ppl say stupid things about it.
Ya, thatās you talking about gene therapy.
Itās possible for people to both lie sometimes and tell the truth. In fact, I imagine you personally do the same, just like everyone else in the world. Itās also possible to say something that isnāt true, but that you believed was true at the time.
Ahh yes, just register so we have all your details before you write anything critical about your leaders. Trust us, we want to do this for your own good. Thanks desantis.
Funnily enough, the original censorship of the airwaves in the US began with prudish priests who didnāt want bad words said in public so they pushed for government mandated censorship.
Stupid woke church trampling first amendment so it can feel good
Shriver on dispatch. Opened my eyes to how someone can truly understand a problem yet not accept a solution even when #[2] slapped her face with it
Also because I loved the mandibles
Was quite good, wish #[2] had another hour or so to properly orange pill her.
Sheās a pretty good example of how hard it is for ppl, even those who understand the problem, to understand that bitcoin can fix it. She seemed quite skeptical throughout the episode
Where were you able to do it?