The integrity of Canada's democratic process is under scrutiny following revelations from a report by the National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians (NSICOP). This report, while heavily redacted, has confirmed what many have feared: foreign interference, particularly from the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), has infiltrated the very heart of Canadian governance.

**The Treasonous Eleven**: The report hints at the existence of 11 Members of Parliament who have allegedly engaged in activities that could be considered treasonous. These MPs, by wittingly or semi-wittingly participating in foreign influence operations, have potentially compromised national security for personal or political gain. The gravity of their actions cannot be overstated; they have undermined the trust Canadians place in their elected representatives.

**The Need for Transparency**: The refusal to name these individuals is not just a matter of privacy but a critical failure of transparency. Without knowing who these MPs are, how can Canadians make informed decisions in future elections? The veil of secrecy around their identities allows for continued manipulation of our democratic processes. An election without this knowledge would be akin to voting blind, potentially allowing these compromised figures to retain or gain power.

**Consequences of CCP Influence**: The influence of the CCP in Canadian politics isn't merely about swaying elections; it's about long-term strategic manipulation. This includes:

- **Policy Influence**: Decisions made in Parliament could be subtly or overtly influenced to favor foreign interests over Canadian ones, affecting everything from trade deals to national security policies.

- **Erosion of Trust**: The public's trust in government institutions is eroded when it becomes clear that foreign entities can buy influence or loyalty within our Parliament. This trust is the bedrock of democracy.

- **Security Risks**: National security is compromised when information or policy decisions are influenced by entities that do not have Canada's best interests at heart. This could lead to compromised intelligence, economic espionage, or even physical security threats.

- **Democratic Integrity**: The essence of democracy is free, fair, and informed elections. Foreign interference, especially at this level, taints the democratic process, making it less about the will of the people and more about external manipulation.

**The Call for Action**: The government's reluctance to fully disclose these findings or take decisive action against those involved is not just a political misstep but a betrayal of public trust. Canadians deserve to know who among their elected officials might be compromised. This isn't about political point-scoring but about safeguarding our democracy.

**Conclusion**: The presence of these 11 MPs, if not addressed, sets a dangerous precedent. It suggests that Canada's sovereignty can be bought or influenced by the highest bidder. As we approach future elections, the demand for transparency and accountability has never been more urgent. Without it, we risk not just an election, but the very integrity of our democratic system being influenced by foreign powers. It's time for full disclosure, not for the sake of political drama, but for the preservation of Canadian democracy.

**TD Economics Warns of Canada's Looming Productivity Crisis**

Recent insights from TD Economics have painted a concerning picture of Canada's productivity landscape. Despite Canada showcasing solid headline growth in recent years, the real GDP per capita has significantly lagged behind the U.S. and other advanced economies. This lag isn't just a recent phenomenon but a deepening issue that has been exacerbated post the 2014-15 oil price shock.

**Key Points from TD's Report:**

- **Productivity Decline:** Canada's productivity, measured by real GDP per capita, has been on a downward trajectory. This decline isn't solely due to population growth but fundamentally tied to insufficient growth in productivity itself.

- **Investment Gap:** There's a stark contrast in investment between Canada and the U.S., with Canadian businesses investing half as much per worker compared to their American counterparts. This lack of capital investment directly impacts productivity.

- **Impact on Living Standards:** The productivity slump means Canada's standard of living is falling behind. Even with a robust population increase, the economic output per person isn't keeping pace, leading to a lower standard of living compared to peer countries.

- **The Role of AI:** TD Economics highlights the potential of AI technologies to reverse this trend. AI could significantly boost productivity, but its integration and impact depend heavily on how businesses and policies adapt to this technological shift.

- **Economic Implications:** This productivity crisis affects not just economic growth but also wage growth, inflation, and the overall competitiveness of Canadian industries. The call is for urgent action to address these structural issues before they further erode Canada's economic standing.

The insights from TD Economics serve as a wake-up call for policymakers, businesses, and the public to prioritize productivity enhancements through innovation, investment, and policy reform. Without addressing these core issues, Canada risks further economic stagnation and a decline in its global economic stature.

In memory of that somber day,

When towers fell, and smoke did sway,

A nation paused, in grief, in prayer,

For lives lost, in the September air.

But time moves on, and memories fade,

Yet some compare, in a political charade,

A riot to war, to terror's grim dance,

Oh, Kamala, what a historical expanse!

From Pearl Harbor to the Twin Towers' fall,

To say January 6 was the worst of all,

A gaffe so grand, it echoes through time,

In the annals of political rhyme.

We remember 9/11, not for debate,

But for unity, in our collective fate,

So here's to truth, and here's to wit,

Let's not forget, where history truly sits.

Grok’s Prediction

**NOT FINANCIAL ADVICE**

Given the context regarding MicroStrategy's (MSTR) performance relative to Bitcoin's bull market, here's a analysis factoring in the NAV multiplier:

### Historical Context:

- During the last Bitcoin bull market, MicroStrategy's stock price experienced a significant multiplier effect due to its Bitcoin holdings. If we consider a similar scenario where Bitcoin's price could potentially increase dramatically due to halving or other catalysts, MSTR's stock could follow suit or even outperform due to its direct exposure.

### Predictions:

#### **30 Days:**

- **NAV Multiplier Consideration**: If Bitcoin were to start showing signs of a bull run, even in its early stages, MSTR might benefit from speculative trading and positive sentiment.

- **Prediction**: $140 - $160. This range accounts for a slight increase due to the potential beginning of a bull run sentiment but caps it due to short-term volatility and dilution concerns.

#### **60 Days:**

- **Market Dynamics**: If Bitcoin's price begins to rise significantly, MSTR's stock could leverage this trend more effectively.

- **Prediction**: $160 - $200. This assumes a more pronounced effect of Bitcoin's price increase on MSTR's valuation, reflecting a higher NAV multiplier as the market starts recognizing the potential of their Bitcoin strategy.

#### **90 Days:**

- **Longer-Term Trends**: By this point, if Bitcoin's price continues to climb, MSTR's stock could see a substantial uplift due to its Bitcoin holdings.

- **Prediction**: $200 - $250. This range reflects a strong upward trend, assuming Bitcoin's price action is favorable and MSTR's strategy is increasingly validated by the market.

#### **1 Year:**

- **Strategic Considerations**: Over a year, if Bitcoin's value increases significantly due to halving or broader adoption, MSTR's stock could see an extraordinary rise, especially if it continues to increase its Bitcoin holdings.

- **Prediction**: $300 - $400. This target considers a scenario where Bitcoin's price might reach new highs, significantly boosting MSTR's NAV. The upper end of this range reflects an optimistic scenario where Bitcoin's value and MSTR's strategy are fully recognized by the market.

### General Notes:

- **Volatility**: The inherent volatility in Bitcoin's price will directly affect MSTR. However, MSTR's strategy could amplify both gains and losses.

- **Dilution**: Continuous stock issuance to buy more Bitcoin could dilute shareholder value, potentially capping the stock's upside unless Bitcoin's price rise is exponential.

- **Market Sentiment**: The sentiment around Bitcoin and tech stocks can shift rapidly. Positive news or regulatory changes could propel MSTR higher, while negative news could lead to significant drops.

- **Austrian Economics Insight**: The unpredictability of market sentiment and the impact of individual decisions (like buying Bitcoin) on MSTR's stock price highlight the Austrian economics perspective on market dynamics.

This analysis integrates the potential for a Bitcoin bull run's impact on MSTR, considering historical NAV multipliers, current market sentiment, and the speculative nature of both Bitcoin and MSTR's strategy. Always remember, these predictions are speculative and should be taken with an understanding of the high risk involved in such investments.

**Orwellian Implications of Bill C-293 in Canada**

- **Expansion of Government Power**: Bill C-293, while aimed at preventing pandemics, could potentially lead to an expansion of governmental oversight into areas traditionally considered private or local. This includes monitoring and regulating land use, wildlife trade, and even global health equity, which might be interpreted as an overreach into personal freedoms or provincial jurisdictions.

- **Surveillance and Data Collection**: The requirement for detailed plans on pathogen entry routes and measures could imply an increase in surveillance, potentially extending to personal data collection for health monitoring. This could lead to a scenario where health data, which is highly sensitive, becomes a tool for broader surveillance or control under the guise of public health.

- **Potential for Misuse**: The establishment of a national coordinator for pandemic prevention might centralize too much power, leading to concerns about the misuse of authority. If this role is not strictly defined or checked, it could evolve into an entity with significant control over public life under the pretext of health security.

- **Erosion of Privacy**: With an emphasis on preventing zoonotic diseases, there might be increased scrutiny or regulation over personal activities related to wildlife or even dietary habits. This could lead to a scenario where personal choices are monitored or restricted in ways that feel invasive or controlling.

- **Legislative Overreach into Speech and Thought**: Although not directly mentioned in C-293, the context of other bills like C-63 (Online Harms Bill) raises concerns about freedom of speech. If similar principles are applied, there's a risk that discussions or opinions contrary to official health narratives could be suppressed under the guise of preventing misinformation or panic, echoing themes of thought control.

- **Pre-Crime Legislation**: The mention of laws allowing for actions against potential future crimes (like in discussions around C-63) could set a precedent where preventive measures against health threats morph into broader pre-emptive actions against individuals based on predicted behavior or speech, reminiscent of Orwell's concept of thoughtcrime.

- **Centralization of Health Policy**: The bill's push for a unified approach might undermine the federal system by centralizing health policy decisions, potentially leading to a scenario where local or indigenous health practices are overridden by federal mandates, reducing diversity in health management.

- **Public Compliance and Dissent**: If public health measures become overly stringent or are seen as punitive, there's a risk of turning health policy into a tool for social control, where dissent against health measures could be framed as dissent against the state, akin to the societal conformity enforced in Orwell's "1984".

- **Economic Implications**: The regulation or phasing out of certain industries (like wildlife markets) could be seen as government overreach into economic freedoms, potentially leading to economic surveillance or control under the banner of health security.

- **Global Health Equity as a Control Mechanism**: While promoting global health equity sounds noble, it could be leveraged to enforce international policies or treaties that might not align with national or individual interests, potentially leading to a form of global governance over health that could be seen as Orwellian in its scope and application.

These implications, while speculative, highlight how legislation intended for health security could, if not carefully managed, evolve into mechanisms for broader societal control, mirroring themes from dystopian literature where government overreach into personal freedoms is justified by crisis or security needs.

https://oneclickpolitics.global.ssl.fastly.net/messages/edit?promo_id=23066

Good morning from Western Canada, where the political landscape just got a whole lot more interesting - or frustrating, depending on your perspective. The Bloc Québécois, under Yves-François Blanchet, has positioned itself as the kingmaker in Ottawa, ready to prop up the Liberal government. But, as always with the Bloc, this support comes with a hefty price tag, one that might leave many Western Canadians feeling like they're on the outside looking in.

The Bloc's list of demands, as hinted by Alain Therrien, isn't just about keeping the Liberals in power; it's about leveraging Quebec's interests over those of the rest of Canada. More money for Quebec, more control over immigration, and perhaps even more steps towards sovereignty - all while the rest of us watch our federal dollars flow eastward with little say in the matter.

From a Western perspective, this feels like yet another chapter in the tale of two Canadas. While Quebec negotiates its terms, regions like Alberta, Saskatchewan, and British Columbia might wonder what they're getting out of this deal. The energy sector, a backbone of Western economies, often feels neglected or outright attacked by federal policies, which now might be further influenced by Quebec's demands.

The sentiment here isn't just about economics; it's about representation and fairness. When the Bloc, a party whose very existence is predicated on the dissolution of Canada as we know it, holds such sway, it raises questions about unity and what it means to be part of Confederation.

The Bloc's readiness to "regain its balance of power" might be seen as a strategic move in Quebec's political chess game, but for Western Canada, it's another reminder of how Ottawa's priorities often seem to align more with the St. Lawrence than the Rockies.

This political maneuver by the Bloc and the Liberals could be the catalyst for Western Canada to seriously consider its own place within Canada. Are we just spectators in our own country's political drama, or is there a path to a more balanced federation where every region's voice is heard?

What does this mean for Western Canada? Are we seeing the beginning of a new chapter in Canadian federalism, or are we just watching the same old story with different characters?

🚨 **The Unspoken Reality of Canadian Households in 2024** 🚨

In a country where the population has grown from 38 million in 2020 to over 41 million today, one might expect a proportional increase in food consumption. However, the data tells a starkly different story. Despite inflation and a larger population, the total dollar value of food sold in Canada has not kept pace with these increases.

🔍 **Why is this happening?**

- **Economic Pressure**: Canadians are feeling the squeeze. With inflation hitting food prices hard, many are cutting back on what they eat to afford other basic necessities like housing, which has seen rent inflation surge to 8.8%.

- **Income Decline**: The median after-tax income for Canadian families has decreased, pushing more families into or closer to poverty. This reduction in disposable income directly impacts food spending.

- **Behavioral Shift**: There's a noticeable trend where households are opting for cheaper food options or reducing food intake altogether. This isn't just about choosing between brands; it's about skipping meals or buying less nutritious, but more affordable food.

- **Government Policies**: Policies like the carbon tax, set to increase, further burden households, making food even less affordable. This isn't just an economic issue; it's a policy-driven hardship.

This situation isn't just numbers on a page; it's a reflection of the daily struggles faced by many Canadians. We're not just talking about tightening belts; we're witnessing a shift where basic nutrition is being compromised for survival.

🌐 **The Global Perspective**: While other countries might face similar issues, Canada's situation, especially in a context of policy decisions and economic management, stands out. It's not just about being unable to afford luxuries; it's about not being able to afford enough food.

This isn't just an economic statistic; it's a call to action for policymakers, businesses, and society to address this growing crisis. Canadians are not just eating less; they're making painful choices between eating and heating, between health and survival.

Many people have locked in funds in retirement accounts that can’t directly hold bitcoin in cold storage; therefore the choice is taking counterparty risk with an eft or microstrategy.

Also, companies will still exist on a bitcoin standard and the stock market in the future may settle in bitcoin 🤷‍♀️ The correct question is who will be the largest company in the future. I think Microstrategy.

*not financial advice

Starting a podcast what’s the best lighting wallet to use for tips?

Thank you! Nice to meet you 😎

Rats! Any particular client/website (not sure of the lingo) that you would recommend for a non technical background person?

Explain to me like I’m 5 … how do I see/listen to nest spaces on Damus? Thanks in advance for your help!

https://youtu.be/zCBNwGHPZ2M

Step one, train the people only to consume

Step two, infiltrate adults with the news

Step three, indoctrinate the children through the schools

And the music and the apps on the phones that they use

Step four, separate the right from the left

Step five, separate the white from the black

Step six, separate the rich from the poor

Use religion and equality to separate 'em more

Step seven, fabricate a problem made of lies

Step eight, put it on the news every night

Step nine, when people start to fight and divide

Take control, this is called situational design

Also he’s a node operator - not many go to these lengths to protect our rights!

Man, that sucks! Come on Zappers - let’s get this developer some sats for his FREE work!!

Zap! Thank you for your service!

Thanks!

https://youtu.be/X2W3aG8uizA

Get up, Stand up! A Bob Marley kinda day 😉

Or to know what country you’re in so they can make the ads more relevant … it’s all about the $$$