eb
temp
ebef8624e24811a0d7f479dea97454e496cf5b230fe62570c0be14b8bca5b17a

I'm curious about one thing: do you think it's normal for one person to just arbitrarily screw with another's life and that pushing a situation to the point where the only impactful option becomes e.g. violence, is normal/reasonable?

But that's a key part isn't it .. "[..] without fear of retribution". There may be reasonable restrictions on matters directly concering another individual, but if it concerns work topics, ideas, objects, etc. one can discuss matters with factual reinforcement.

Why would I be insulted if you argue that a certain idea is problematic and you point out some good reasons to reinforce your argument? I can either agree/accept your arguments or counter or recontextualize/refine. In the end, we can choose to agree or disagree. It doesn't need to be personal or vindictive.

It's not that easy. Force and fraud outside of one's control are not one's responsibility. It would be like hitting someone then blaming them for catching their fist.

Thanks. Fwiw, it's nice to read a clear unambiguous message in support for once.

I know saying this now, does not acknowledge plenty of messages in the past that were in support of me, but right now it is nice to read.

Replying to Avatar Ch!llN0w1

This is so sad. So, what you're saying is: don't expect your basic human rights to apply? Seriously, even if the advice is meant well, these are huuuuuge flags for unsafe environment of any kind or capacity.

Replying to Avatar Ch!llN0w1

Is this a joke? Do you know how many false accusations I have needed to go through that were deliberate misrepresentations of what I never even did wrong? Then, they also don't want to know the truth. The whole shitshow depends on both massive deception and refusing the inconvenient truth.

I'm so tired of the "fake wisdom" bullshit. Of cpurse the mind eesponds to outside stimuli. I'm pretty sure you are damn well aware of whst's going on, so let me point out the elephant in the room.

8+ years of continuous, persistent harassment, attacks false accusations, lies, deception, .. pf course will make someone respond. In the same way, simply lying about it makes someone choose to evaluate the message or even just the person in a certain way.

You aren't making much of a point. Especially in massive human-rights-violating situations where you're forcing someone into violence in orde to allow for anything to ever be resolved.

How disturbed do you have to be, to not see that there are many things wrong with that?