Why don't you give me the information instead, so that I can make my own decision. So far, I have made few bad decisions and I've been attacked over all kinds of rotten, stupid behavior based on false information.

Is this about a present event? Who are involved?

What choices? I've heard a lot of bullshit.

I think you vastly underestimate how much deception and abuse has been going on.

Nah, that's not it. The harassment and abuse was first. To attack me for 8 years, and then call me arrogant for stating a truthful position, is not ego. It's self-respect for stating the circumstances as they are, instead of being swallowed by an abusive misinformed population.

You're missing the point. It was never about "avoiding conflict". There is massive malicious acting on part on a large number of people.

Sure. I was thinking you meant network-level (passive) observation.

Any OS-privileged compromise would possibly affect any program, with the exception of "third-party" "assistance" such by using TPM or TEE right? (Unless you meant something like hooking into keyboard-handling hooks that aren't well protected/separated/isolated.)

Does Keychat do this differently, or any other reason for the emphasis?

Also, slight inaccuracy but nitpicking. One can send multiple messages in a series all in the same ratchet. So it isn't a "single" message. I'm guessing you meant that.

What kind of eavesdropping are you referring to?

Well, it's not so much about a single message as it is about a single series. Both parties need to have sent a message to achieve confirmation of new keys. Multiple messages sent back to back of one party all use same key, iirc.

Sorry man. You can't dismiss all of the malicious bullshit that easily. A lot happened in physical vicinity and with real people. You cannot blame a chatbot for those.

Standing by my principles isn't easy and isn't pleasurable. Drawing a line for what is abuse on top of abuse on top of abuse, isn't pleasurable. It has to stop somewhere.

Stop making convenient arbitrary assumptions.

Nice try. You are responding to false claims. And you are unable to disprove your assumptuous implications.

No it's not. It's the same as saying: on the battlefield, just ignore the battle otherwise it messes up your garden and it makes it look like you're a bad gardner.

What failure? It's all arbitrary bullshit. It isn't based in reality.

I have been stabbed in the back for at least the last 10 years. I have had to deal with constant unexplained attacks and persistent blocking/rejection/dismissal/denial of the truth. Every attempt at peaceful resolution gets blocked and abused. The last 10 years of my life have been ruined WHILE I TRIED TO FIND PEACEFUL SOLUTIONS AND ATTEMPTED TO CLARIFY THEIR "MISUNDERSTANDINGS".

What point are you making?

I don't understand what point you're trying to make.

Don't be an idiot. One or two programmers/reviewers/auditors could've told you the state of affairs, independent review. You all chose attacking and thus exposed that you really cared more about being the asshole than privacy and security as *principles*.

One nostrich called it: many people, including very much in security field, exposed what they really cared about: money, attention, exposure.

I have no clue what point you think you're trying to make.

Wait .. you people came up with the Andrew Tate refs first. Why was that?

It is when their projections become collective delusion and these deluded people decide that a coordinated harassment campaign is a necessary "solution".

This statement is filled with assumptions.

Waaaaaiiiit a minute. Aren't you chancelor to the Klingon High Council or smth? What about your army, your battle spirit, your honor?

nostr:nprofile1qqsxpuhwm8qys9q4gc7e0xvjp8mp6apf2ukptkyhrsc6hzqjd93vjrcpz4mhxue69uhkummnw3ezummcw3ezuer9wchs4xcj98 I need information about all the malicious and manipulative bullshit that's going on.

I thought your lawyer advised you not to encourage violence. 😋