I think we all want to hear more. I get he’s an ossification guy, but if he sees devs as an attack on his net worth, then it might get rocky when soft fork discussions rev up
Listening to nostr:npub1qny3tkh0acurzla8x3zy4nhrjz5zd8l9sy9jys09umwng00manysew95gx and nostr:npub1guh5grefa7vkay4ps6udxg8lrqxg2kgr3qh9n4gduxut64nfxq0q9y6hjy , and the argument for supporting Open Sats and bitcoin developers is too strong to ignore supporting the maintenance of the network that backs my #bitcoin . Why doesn’t @saylor and the “bitcoin development company” $mstr appreciate this ?
Now there are ETFs, I think there is an argument for share holder activitism, even with the strong argument for mstr over an etf. Thoughts nostr:npub1k7vkcxp7qdkly7qzj3dcpw7u3v9lt9cmvcs6s6ln26wrxggh7p7su3c04l ?

If he's putting his thumb on the scale on behalf of ossification beyond sharing his opinions and arguments, then it might get messy. 
If true, it was all lies.
Saylor 2021:

Welcome











nostr:note1ln2xadpxvfspz8m5qweknqzxxeh3r22mqz86tz9rqurs97xf0wgsu8dyrp