Avatar
Jeff Swann
ec99edc5567e02815fb15020285e2fa8390931cedf59c83d6bb2c5f6ee1530b9
Politics divides. Trade brings people together. Destroy political power & set trade free.

So ETF bitcoin can easily beat up cold storage bitcoin?

Disagree...

You mean the people invited in & escorted through the building by police? You can watch the videos. The FBI agents who were in the crowd to try to turn everything violent aren't in prison.

If "thee" & "thou" were all there was to worry about it wouldn't be a deal. That doesn't even begin to illustrate the size & scope of the translation problems. Figures of speech & idoms have been translated literally & it has basically made people believe in all sorts of cartoonish things.

For the record, I don't care if you vote. I just don't think it matters. If you do I really will sell you my vote, but it's got to be worth my time to drive there & stand in line & deal with all the BS. If it really matters that much to you, how many votes are you willing to purchase? I am sure others would be happy to participate too. Or does it not really matter that much to you when it actually costs something?

That's a nice wish, but reality says otherwise. The republic is dead.

The US govt unilaterally shut down businesses & fired people working for private companies across multiple industries for refusing an experimental medical product. What part of our "constitutional republic" allowed that?

They could already. I'll take my chances. But even so I'd rather be in jail as a cost & a drain on the system than contributing to any of this bullshit.

If a draft was imposed I would just refuse to go. I'd leave the country if necessary. I'm not fighting in any war for any of these pedo criminals.

Trump put Fauci in power. Trump gave Bolton a position. He banned bump stocks. He threw all the Jan 6th people under the bus & let many rot in cages for no reason what so ever. Whether he is that easy to manipulate or he's just too stupid to know any better is kinda irrelevant. I don't want to support any of that.

You can call me a pussy if you want, but nothing you are doing is going to "fix" the elections that have clearly already become corrupt. Vote harder all you want. That's not for me. I'll happily sell you my vote for some sats if it means that much to you. Will provide video evidence of whole voting process.

The antidote to the WEF & any national govt is nullification of their policies via liberating ideas & technologies spread at a local level.

Votes don't fix anything. Stop working for politically connected corporations. Stop paying taxes in every way possible. Stop using dollars wherever possible. Defy bad laws & be productive without asking permission. Move to a small town and spread bitcoin & keet & anti-govt ideas among the sheriff dept & other local authorities.

Nah, not voting is just refusing to support any sort of evil.

If you want the kid down the street to shovel your driveway in the winter you have to buy him a house. If you want some kid to lifeguard at the local pool you have to buy him a house. Burger flippers, they get a house too. Everyone gets a house! A house & steaks & vacay time in the big rock candy mountains.

Why is dancing the favorite choice of current propagandists? Nurses, cops, pro-jab late night tv shows... And what kind of idiot doesn't see it as some sort of weird ass red flag? I think my face may one day freeze in a permanent wtf look.

Replying to Avatar Matt

To fight against overregulation is to accept some regulation. How does one objectively define "overregulation?"

"No regulation" is easy. It's defined by 0. Fighting for no regulation makes sense, because there is an objective goal that can be measured by everyone with the same result, like 2+2=4.

"Overregulation" has no objective meaning. KYC may be overregulation to you, but not to someone else. And how could you even debate your position when your metric has no objective definition?

Fighting "overregulation" is to fight a battle with no concept of winning. When exactly have you won? What amount of regulation is below "overregulation?" Where is the line, and how does one know when it's been crossed?

Fighting for rights with the goal of preventing "overregulation" or "too much violation" is not a long term strategy for success, if defending rights is the goal. You're already accepting a level of rights violation, which means you're accepting that you don't actually have a right; you have only that which is being granted to you.

Only taking 50% of a slave's labor by force doesn't somehow make him free. The only moral stance is to protect 100% of a man's labor from being taken by force. Defending him from "over enslavement" (is that 25%? 50? Define it...) is to accept that he has no right to not be enslaved. The line can always be moved. Zero tolerance can't be. It is zero or a violation, which must not be tolerated.

#Bitcoin should have zero regulation. No regulation on possession, transfer, or mining. There is no acceptable level at which my right to sound money may be violated. Otherwise, I have no true right to sound money. I'm right back at fiat, whereby I'm told how much freedom I have. That's not freedom at all.

No centralized & coercively funded regulation. Bitcoin is regulated by the code. We need protocols where the incentives & regulation are built in from the ground up.

Does anyone who majors in philosophy end up anything other than a socialist, a nihilist, or some other form of denying reality? Any former philosophy majors here?

nostr:nevent1qqsdwxe6etgc36e90t4ehr2h5aphpqpy87etrgr6rxfnm4q8mmg4g4gpp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mqzypzmx4fpcvf2tkjvy4v8qwk5hc7jumggeqf929g5c7s7k744lg8sgqcyqqqqqqgeugqey