I think we should just stick to what has worked for a really long time & not let the mentally deranged reorganize everything in society for no good reason.
I think you fail to appreciate how much more dangerous it would be for any female to play sports at all. If highschool males can beat professional females in soccer, the idea that highschool females would even want to compete & risk getting slide tackled is kinda ridiculous. I was once bicycle kicked in the face when diving to head the ball. If I was almost half my weight & female it would have probably been way worse, might have broken my neck. And what you are describing sounds like you don't want anyone to keep score either... "just let people play because they love it." It sounds like you live in some sort of fantasy world. There is nothing wrong with competition (which is kinda the point) or with enjoying the competition so long as it is SANE & HEALTHY & generally fair.
Segregating out the trans faggots & giving them their own league would make more sense. But then they wouldn't have anyone but each other to try to take advantage of & there'd be no established system to benefit from so they almost certainly wouldn't want that. Maybe put them in with the special olympics people. Competing against other retarded men actually seems like the correct placement.
Happy #Bitcoin Independence Day
It's very difficult to find unvaxxed people without dating apps these days.
Physical differences between men & women would just eliminate female sports entirely if there was desegregation.
The 203rd ranked male played the Williams sisters in tennis & mopped the floor with them. A male highschool soccer team beat the professional women's team.
Sex based segregation is the only reason women have a presence in sports at all.
Refusing the fight upfront would certainly have been the smarter move.
If someone presents themselves a certain way & they never make it an issue then I basically have no problem with it, but if it's a painfully obvious lie & they want everyone to pretend otherwise, then I completely agree.
You can pretend to be whatever you want, right up to the point where it involves others. You can't demand to be recognized as something you aren't & the biological men who want to physically compete with women & anyone who supports or allows it are all human garbage.
I was owed 11btc & change & I got just over half a bitcoin, how did you get ~20% if I only got ~5%?
Why use Monero's future L2 if blocksize is dynamic & can adjust to any demand?
There is no exchange risk when swapping between BTC tokens. Liquid to LN swaps happen in the background when you make a txn from a wallet. So if someone doesn't support Liquid they get a LN payment instead. There will be similar bridges to everything else & LN forced closes will mostly be LSP problems, not average consumer level issues.
But then realize they have overthrown stable & prosperous societies in favor of some of the dumbest thugs on the planet because the intelligent leadership didn't bend the knee & couldn't be bribed, and remember how they explicitly aim to disinform the domestic population in order to enslave everyone...
The MtGox payout was 5¢ on the dollar & it looks like somehow MtGox gets to keep a bunch of #bitcoin... It's amazing how fucked up the "legal" system really is. Fucking criminal clown world.
Fees are likely to be very high, but that's okay. Arks, ecash fedimints, liquid, etc will give us lots of optionality, lightning will bridge all the layers, & maybe signature aggregation will help most people retain the ability to have an onchain footprint of some sort.
Normie friend has confirmed that there is a significant difference in his kids' behavior in the afternoons or days after events involving lots of juice & junk food
I think we're going to get something much better... Listen to Bitcoin Audible & The Pear Report 😏
Bitcoin is always going to show a clear path back to issuance, that's how triple entry accounting works & is one of the key innovations we need to prevent inflation & counterfeiting.
Some of the richest people in bitcoin are anonymous cypherpunks who quietly go about their lives. Providing liquidity for more private payment layers helps them as much as it helps others.
Privacy is still possible with traceable base layer txns. Moving money through other layers breaks the clear link to ownership onchain.
Scarcity doesn't automatically mean value.
Price is a function of both supply and demand. You can control supply, not demand.
Value is subjective don't you know this? Arent you an Austrian Econ enjoooyer?
https://github.com/libbitcoin/libbitcoin-system/wiki/Scarcity-Fallacy
Yes, I know that value is subjective. I think the tail emmission ultimately has very little to do with why Monero will fail. I was just answering a question about the supply of Monero.
Being scarce & desired by many people are prerequisites to being a means of exchange. Scarce & desirable things tend to be decent stores of value. "I want that" necessarily comes before "I will trade for that."
I think services like Rumble might end up being good assets to our more decentralized protocols. They are a potential server farm earning sats for hosting in the decentralized internet of the future. They support free speech & they own their own infrastructure.
