South Park provides us with a TL;DR:
No, the one about the former 2nd in command who is now practicing it "independently"
Also watched a couple of clips from Leah R-whatever
Got sucked into a documentary last night about the Church of Scientology.
😳
guess this might be good: [gnu fsf page](https://www.gnu.org/software/bash/manual/)
What's the best book on #bash or bash scripting (or comprehensive tutorial)?
#asknostr
A creator who grants freedom. We screw up. He pays our ransom...with his own life. Grace vs karma. It's a pretty sweet deal...hope you'll reconsider some day. 🤙🏼
Read Genesis 1-3, friend. Our existence is a gift, and we were given freedom in paradise. We were "blessed," and it was all good. But we screwed it up, bad. But there's good news too (Genesis 3:15): read the gospel of John.
Nothing to fear in Christ. Ever.
Yep. It's another litmus test, IMO.
Imagine thinking self-replicating organisms (and food for them) were an accident
And it takes two -- blowing probabilities out of the water by orders of magnitude
Talk about a "leap of faith"
Cognitive dissonance is STRONG with the unbelievers
The evidence is in you, around you, you breathe it, eat it, drink it, think it...
stop running
Crash tests show nation's guardrail system can't handle heavy electric vehicles
Comments ( https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39215662 )
...man...everything about this EV stuff is just...half-baked...
>Remembering mine affliction and my misery, the wormwood and the gall. My soul hath them still in remembrance, and is humbled in me. This I recall to my mind, therefore have I hope. It is of the LORD'S mercies that we are not consumed, because his compassions fail not. They are new every morning: great is thy faithfulness. The LORD is my portion, saith my soul; therefore will I hope in him. The LORD is good unto them that wait for him, to the soul that seeketh him. It is good that a man should both hope and quietly wait for the salvation of the LORD.
[Lamentations 3:19-26](http://blb.org/kjv/lam/3/19-26/), KJV
gm #plebchain #coffeechain
(Now there's a balanced epistemology!)
No, we must critically rethink the wheel, because of the unprecedented challenges to global sustainability
How do you know that some things are unknowable? How do you know that there will "never be" credible evidence to support certain beliefs? Those sound suspiciously like...beliefs... (I mean no disrespect here, just engaging, if you don't mind).
Heads up - bout to do a 'lil stack so, if you've been waiting for a little dip, stand by -- works every time
Roy A. Clouser, [The Myth of Religious Neutrality: An Essay on the Hidden Role of Religious Belief in Theories](https://amzn.to/3Ug8rdo)
#m=image%2Fjpeg&dim=1079x1535&blurhash=%5E%5BLqU*afxuayxuj%5B%7EqWUWAayRjj%5BxuayayfQayfQIUj%5Bj%5BjtoeayRij%5Bayfkj%5Bayt7juayfPayayt7ayayfRayjuWBayj%5Bayj%5BfkRjj%5Bj%5Ba%7Cj%5Bf6&x=afa08ae34f9329b55554ea888c0d673526ef6aaab9d03d62633f701bf80e9325But the former is impossible. Our presuppositions condition our interpretations of all evidence -- i.e., there is no such thing as neutrality. Especially in questions of metaphysics...