I will have to stick my neck out and disagree.
Paid relays aren't the solution. We need to keep working on this.
We need proof of work relays. We need an option to pay with sats to post (like on your phone, to avoid battery drain).
'Paid' relays don't fix spam, it just creates a little garden with high fences, for you and a few friends.
'Paid' relays should be optional. They should provide optional features like skipping the sats to post or work, or priority on bandwidth, NIPS05, backups, etc.
If we paywall this shit, it'll never defeat the mainstream systems of control, leaving millions behind. We must do better than pretty gardens with high fences. We want everyone to be free.
laggy
The question is, should it be replaced by the amount of sats zapped in total, or total times zapped?
Reacting is needed, just to communicate that someone isn't just talking to themselves on a private relay or being stealth censored. Zaps are the real communication of how much you like it
The funny part is that the dream of the capitalist produces the good for everyone, while the dream for the socialist produces ruin and starvation for everyone.
I suppose so. It's definitely been suggested that revocation is important, but it's not in there yet.
The NIPS for this doesn't currently have revocability. Messages are too ephemeral and there's no mechanism for knowing that all nodes have seen the revoke message.
The best we have is if the relay has seen the message, the message itself sets an expiration. So if you delegate signing to another key for 3 days, 30 days, whatever, any relay that has seen this delegation will accept messages signed by the key until the time-out. If it hasn't seen the delegation message, though, it will reject them.
#1 Zap stats on posts; Zaps sent/received on profile. Zaps in notifications
#2 'Whats Zappening' - Friends+ view of most zapped, most sats feed - instead of 'Following' for the Home icon, following moves down one.
#3 Channels support (NIPS 28) basically its a public room version of the Messages UI
#4 Rename Global - It's really not global. It's friends+
#5 maybe a real global - only if we can configure which relays to see from.
#6 Read/Write option for each relay
You're the owner of that product, at least. We're not going to be free of the economics of it. People need to buy eyes to sell services and products. At least now, you get that spending, instead of a big agency middleman who herd like cattle all the people onto their platform.
There is no platform. Each relay is a service provider, able to have whatever terms of that service as required by local law or their own ideals.
We need some kind of payment sharing between host of videos and the creators themselves.
All of #Bitcoin leaving Twitter for #Nostr may not be as great a thing as we think.
Keep fighting, on all fronts.
If the normies never hear from us again, we doom them to tyranny and debt.
This is good for #Nostr