ef
nobody
efb8614ca2ab15152fffa65317a2ff8aa556a9cc9b312d774813042b7f8f11d7
account deleted

Unbelievably salient in today's world.

I don't trust the East and know not what the West has become.

Those of us awake are in desperate need of finding each other. nostr:note1e5w2977q6ururq22chln5k2s7dt9p9n0rlyuhajxfcf6p7ylvl8sdtv7jh

Spoiler: the guitar session is horrific television.

Just horrific. nostr:note19nl5fw5dkfc3k8xrl8cvxgu9em93zf8vxuenpfdqstn7tmtxllrqwml6hl

Every day I spare a thought for all those souls still working in the fiat mines.

He knew he had to get the lions share of the supply issuance into the hands of cypherpunks and people who utterly comprehend the gravity of the situation. He knew there was a need to empower those people and reward them to protect the protocol.

I find these comments really interesting. It certainly does seem like there is more intellectual capitulation going on rather than a short term greediness.

"Well I guess I have to figure this thing out. It must actually be a thing and here to stay." nostr:note1zshcjw8cyw588affzd0c254n3wtpjpn7t7tgh6009yzw8kzrd83q2qwsas

Not quite the same vibes lol nostr:note148jvza56agg7p03xe8cttzmfhxvk3jaqydz79ykylktn3tvp6w3slegqjc

It's the handing down that's going to be the most satisfying part. Not just one generation either. nostr:note1ktc5f9ek999nl4wg4zw8vkqnrlgfrsnn9u3weg47w4rxfnvhk67qpeep2z

Too few understand the long term deflationary power of Bitcoin and see it simply as a financial asset to trade. Certainly 90% of the institutional buyers probably fall into this category. So this cycle as the price rises you will see plenty of profit takers who will sell at a 2x or 3x avoiding a genuine liquidity squeeze.

Ultimately the true supply squeeze will come when the world accepts Bitcoin is the premium monetary good that you should never sell. This maturity of understanding takes time. Next cycle we will have a significant number of institutional capital allocators with a higher conviction on the purpose and utility of Bitcoin with a hodl strategy. Demand will completely overwhelm supply and exchanges will freeze. Price will gap from 500k to 2 million circa 2028/29. That's just the way I see it.

Replying to Avatar Dr. Hax

I want to believe that #bitcoin will encourage society to move towards using durable goods and sustainability instead of infinite growth.

Lets steel man this idea.

Counterarguments:

- While the theory sounds romantic, what has been built in practice by bitcoiners are things like Mt Gox and FTX. Trading platforms that just serve financial markets, which is the very core of this infinite growth mentality

- After 10+ years, it's still generally not accepted as payment

- The energy required can't be ignored, especially in light of the above. I understand the benefits of replacing load banks, heating, and green energy, but there are more efficent ways to generate heat, and mankind's energy would be a higger percentage of renewables if bitcoin weren't using so much electricity. Even if using miners as load banks is 100% justified, that doesn't justify all the other mining operations.

- The theory that it's decentralized is wonderful, but on real life, mining is fairly centralized,

Help convince me (one way or the other) using evidence. Better yet, help convince a zero-coiner who is thinking these same things.

I want the arguments that really hit hard, not potential solutions. Not the usual suspects like "BitAxe wants to disrupt centralized mining". Yeah, that's great, and I support them, but until they prove they can do it, lets just acknowledge that this is a problem yet to be solved.

The same goes for the "Lightning is going to solve the efficency problem". It hasn't yet. #bitcoin is seriously easy to use. Lightning is not. Honestly, I feel that downloading a wallet is easier than signing up for a custodial lightning account, and if we're talking about self-custody, let's come back to that in another 4 years.

I'm sure some maxis are going to jump in and call me a fiat shill or whatever, and that's fine, I can ignore anyone who doesn't wasnt to have a constructive conversation. It's the actual discourse that I am interested in.

Give me your evidence that #bitcoin is just the ticket to eliminating the growth at all costs mindset.

If bitcoin is global reserve asset then the fixed supply forces the world into a deflationary spiral of sorts. In such an environment the only way you ever commit to consumption in the present is if you can extract a lasting utility from that good/widget over a long time period.

Plastic toys become pointless. Wooden toys that are passed down are a far wiser consumption preference. Construction trends towards homes capable of standing 500 years not 50 years. All this bodes well for a culture enshrining sustainable practices as economic incentives align.

What you need to do is adjust your time horizons. I remember being utter infuriated in 1996 over the speed of internet page loading times over a dial up modem. Nothing about anything worked particularly well despite the internet being around and in development for a decade. Yet 10 years later as mobile phones collided with the internet protocols human interconnectedness simply exploded - dematerialising huge aspects of civilisation. I didn't have the foresight in 1996.

Bitcoin hash rate is growing, development is moving at a rate commensurate to the importance of getting the foundations right, economic incentives align with sustainability ideals, and in and on.

Where are you sourcing information from?

Do you follow Troy Cross? Lyn Alden? Have you read any of Fidelity's reports? Do subscribe to any paid research like ARK? Do you have mempool.space bookmarked? Any overarching dashboards you follow like bitbo.io to give you a feel for how the protocol is behaving? Do you follow any of the key capital allocators in the space like ego death capital to better understand the layer 2 scaling strategies? I've barely scratched the surface there.

My point here is this - how much work are you willing to do to get your head around a paradigm shift in how we as humans interact?

Sorry I realise I haven't given you specific answers but to be fair your post was pretty unstructured and broad!

I agree this is a much stronger position to take. Right now both have intrinsic value though. One is eroding rapidly and the other is growing with hash. nostr:note1hdwp8tld5nz7u7ngtdwxv2vx6phaj6lqp76j3m40u87tpksr6a5se6zdcp

Yeah I understand. I was curious if there was some drastic shift in context I'd missed along the way. 👍🏻

Jor this happens all the time in Australia.

When you mess up you cop abuse and you take the tough love. Sometimes a brutal reality check is the greatest form of love someone can show you.

Everyone is different.

I get where you are coming from - but we have leave some scope in our society to battle each other with language. It sure beats the sword. I'm not sure the word 'normie' is ever applied in a context of actual hatred.

Prophetic universal truth. nostr:note13zyxmlsfs5x0wkvlszjzsqjvjmmnhd8v4mdw4j5f2v3s2p0j750sk0sa2x

Can anyone on #nostr even imagine going back to X? I get zero engagement on Nostr but I'm infinately happier. Fuck engagement 🤣 nostr:note1cpz3l5z5f5l2qulqvdjyesmgctwuw4szt7urctmngskc4ydwnkjsk6r8gt