I think you mean "number spendable from my utxos go up" unless you like collecting dust!
Fun Fact: "Cache" can be said to mean "storage of valuable things"
It's ironic then how cash behaves in practice 😉
Good knife!
Energy is everything, might as well flaunt it if you have it 😎
When in the history of the universe did energy ever become irrelevant?
It's everything there is. Quite literally.
Come back to reality.
I have released a unique privacy tool and code library that broadcasts Bitcoin transactions **directly** into the P2P network.
1. No external dependencies whatsoever.
2. No centralized backends.
3. Uses Tor if found running on the same system. Having the Tor Browser open in the background is enough.
Find the CLI here:
https://crates.io/crates/pushtx-cli
And the Rust crate here:
How does it find peers? Same way core would?
You were looking for a form in the readme to enter your email and have it delivered to you? 🤣🤣🤣
17 tweets, over 7 months, from hundreds of congressional accounts?
Not exactly sus. Mildly remarkable maybe.
What I think "woke" means...
A content score doesn't "boil down" by itself to a user score. Users or clients who want a simpler WoT can boil it down and lose some precision in their modeling, but settling for less granularity across the board seems retarded in the literal sense
Every user exists on a spectrum of engagement & activity. So any WoT will need user input, and I think profile level labels might be too broad, but really, most users won't engage at all.
Unless... "trust engagement" is made a first class citizen of consuming a post. Posts are immutable, but people change all the time, so the trust should be tagged to posts to be most effective.
Naively, a swipe left/right feed could maybe generate some good insights, as users are forced to make a binary choice at every post 🤷♂️
Applying a single trust score to all content from a person is like trying to apply a single interest rate for every loan in a country.