Avatar
PK ⚡️
f43c2c03f1c9f930cf8b71dae7e4dd6b9e8e38115df9869bd5a2c2402302e77e
Father, husband, UI architect, software engineer (ex-Meta, ex-FullStory, ex-DISCO)
Replying to Avatar ODELL

PRIORITIES:

FAMILY

BITCOIN

OTHER

But I was told that Bitcoin was broken

Replying to Avatar HODL

I love this

Thanks!

The clarity of the mind, the healing of the gut, and the sense of accomplishment.

It’s so rewarding!

Crazy isn’t it? I’m close to 7 years!

Happy halving! #Bitcoin

Replying to Avatar Jameson Lopp

I love this so much I can’t quantify it

Nostr is a giant shit show. The fact that our software interoperates at all is a miracle and probably just a temporary anomaly. Given enough time, the relentless breaking changes being made to published NIPs will eventually break everything.

Linux succeeded because "WE DO NOT BREAK USERSPACE". For nostr to succeed, changes must "NOT BREAK EXISTING IMPLEMENTATIONS". There shouldn't be any exceptions to that EVEN IF THE IMPLEMENTATION WAS NON-COMPLIANT.

Pay close attention to Linus right here:

> Are you saying that pulseaudio is entering on some weird loop if the

> returned value is not -EINVAL? That seems a bug at pulseaudio.

Mauro, SHUT THE FUCK UP!

It's a bug alright - in the kernel. How long have you been a

maintainer? And you *still* haven't learnt the first rule of kernel

maintenance?

If a change results in user programs breaking, it's a bug in the

kernel. We never EVER blame the user programs. How hard can this be to

understand?

Linus doesn't want to break pulseaudio EVEN THOUGH pulseaudio was doing the wrong thing.

It seems like every week I find a NIP that I've coded for has changed. This last week I think it happened three times already. Sometimes it's a small change and I quickly update my code. But I can't read all the PRs, and I'm afraid dozens of small changes have slipped past my notice. Gossip is probably now incompatible with multiple other implementations which happen to have implemented different versions of the same NIPs (some older, some newer).

Even if we didn't have any breaking changes, the simple fact that different software implements different optional NIPs itself presents to end users like broken software. Why does it work in Damus but not Amethyst? Why does it work in Amethyst but not Coracle? That is an even harder problem to solve.

But let's at least solve the easier problem and stop changing NIPs. If you don't like a NIP make a new one, don't break the current one. Even if you think the current one sucks balls and should have never happened. Even if you think there aren't many implementations out there.

I get what you're saying

But as a long-time web developer I have to point to web browsers