Darn it. The bulls are strong. Don't want to risk missing a move up. Back into #bitcoin. Made a tiny bit on the way down.
#trading
I like to read a summary first, even if I read the full article.
AI summary:
The article argues that the justification for free speech based on the idea that it leads to the emergence of truth is flawed, particularly in the context of social media. The author claims that simply increasing the amount of information available does not necessarily lead to the truth rising to the surface, and that people's psychological orientation towards truth is a crucial factor in determining whether free speech can lead to the discovery of truth.
The article suggests that social media platforms, with their algorithms designed to maximize user engagement, can actually hinder the pursuit of truth and instead promote the spread of misinformation. In contrast, decentralized and open networks like Nostr, which allow users to make their own decisions about what content to consume, may be more conducive to the pursuit of truth.
The author also draws on historical examples, such as the invention of the printing press, to illustrate that the dissemination of information does not necessarily lead to a greater understanding of truth. The printing press, while allowing for the spread of ideas and the democratization of faith, also enabled the dissemination of misinformation and propaganda.
Ultimately, the article argues that free speech is important for human dignity and the development of individual conscience, but that its relation to truth is more complex and depends on the psychological orientation of individuals towards truth. The author suggests that a more nuanced understanding of the relationship between free speech and truth is needed, and that decentralized and open networks like Nostr may offer a more promising approach to promoting the pursuit of truth.
Great work! Tl;Dr? 😅
About the article, yup, the system is rigged. I'm just trying to survive in it.
I realize it's a joke. But just for the record, it's wrong. Traders do provide a service to society. And that's a standard that many other jobs would not even pass.
It's both and, not either or. Bitcoin is a revolution. AND it's an investment with huge fiat growth. Why does it need to be either or?
Man, the bulls are fighting. 92 held, now they're trying to push higher.
I'm still in fiat, I still think price has a good chance of going lower. But this is so close.
#bitcoin #trading
Have a great trip.
U.S. Bitcoin ETFs shed $1.2 billion in three-day outflow streak, longest since election
#bitcoin #trading
How are you calculating the returns? $1 to $15 is 1400%.
Which clients have outbox? Is that a NIP that some clients don't implement?
So far, 93 has been holding, but let's see...
Isn't content persistence a relay issue rather than a protocol issue? Someone could run a relay that promises to preserve all your content. Doing so is a responsibility that not every relay wants to take, especially given that people are running relays for free.
I just want to get as many bitcoins as I can. Any time the price falls, I am able to get more, because it's cheaper. You and I, we're trying to do the same thing - get as many bitcoins as we can.
Let me rephrase that. Whatever you're buying, I don't see that on the chart. Sorry, just calling them as I see them. https://media2.giphy.com/media/5rz4sFXqTT98Z342g9/200w.webp?cid=4ea4f8d53s6hkah3ud7p4wo0t8nn7o9zq5qyiahlso50r6tg&ep=v1_gifs_search&rid=200w.webp&ct=g
Are the poll questions structured as notes? Where can I see them in a regular client?