f6
anon
f654579e5c7f7cbb6992b37b1966d75cff4080e047808493a31c77f97ca534f7

Hrm, ok.

Yea, but it's still a valuable feedback mechanism in a WoT scenario, for example.

Agree that it doesn't signal whether the content has a specific monetary value to the reader. But anecdotally (for what that's worth) I (have observed that others) don't assign a monetary value to things that make them laugh, for example. It could be a hangover from the current cultural paradigm, where content is assumed to be free, but I think it might be a little more complicated than that. I think people may get value from content and not even realise they have. And that is different to reading a piece of content, learning something new, and making that connection between the content and the value in it.

Anyway, I see where you're going. It'll be an interesting experiment I guess.

Are you not worried that people might choose to ignore rather than engage, and that a signal between creators and their audience might end up being lost. It's an acknowledgement, even when you have nothing to add.

What do you not like about them?

They're not trolls they're vibeposters.