I have but they all are pretty ingredient heavy. I may just try salt pepper ginger and maybe some coconut aminos instead of soy
Just ran it. Both were run without running a VPN
I'm looking for a simple Flanken rib (Korean rib) recipe.
Does anyone on here have a good recommendation?
#Food #AskNOSTR #GrowNOSTR
https://void.cat/d/W7Tm7oDGp1PTxZV3ekganV.webp
#growthememecollection
Great site to check your browser against if you were unaware like I was because IT is not my thing
This is true, but then you have shit like this that can suck you back in
Anyone have a good Flanken rib recipe? This is the one I'm leaning towards and looking for more input
https://iheartumami.com/kalbi-short-ribs-recipe/
#grownostr #cooking
https://investablewealth.com/loan-delinquencies-are-rising-230905/
#finance #grownostr
https://responsiblestatecraft.org/2023/08/28/whats-so-bad-about-aggressive-neutrality/
"While it is hardly surprising that Washington would leverage its influence to support a soft regime change of sorts in Islamabad, what is remarkable is the desire to punish a country far away from Europe and the conflict raging in Ukraine for daring to take an “aggressively neutral” stance (the State Department’s terminology, according to the cables) on what to them is a regional conflict far away from their core security concerns.
The presumption among leaders in the U.S. foreign policy establishment is clear: States with less geopolitical influence have to follow Washington’s lead on major global crises, whether it benefits them or not. Pakistan’s neighbor India, by contrast, has charted a remarkably neutral stance over the course of the war by balancing opposition to border revisionism with a clear-eyed determination to maintain its long-standing military ties with Moscow. But New Delhi knows that its much greater power on the world stage gives it some protection from the wrath of Washington.
Smaller countries do not share this privilege. Meanwhile, it is hard to see why Pakistan’s views regarding European affairs even matter to Washington any more than, say, an Eastern European country’s formal stance on the dispute between India and Pakistan over Kashmir. Bulgaria, to use one example, would not be expected to declare a strong position on the geopolitics of the Indian Ocean.
But the U.S. foreign policy elite, so monomaniacally fixated on Ukraine, believes it is of vital importance that everyone else adopt its priorities. This assumption is not only dangerous to many of Washington’s partners in various regions around the world; it is also dangerous to the grand strategy of the United States itself. By taking regional conflicts and unnecessarily globalizing them, the risk of spreading instability through the interdiction of vital raw materials or manufactured goods increases. Trade networks adversely impacted by sanctions can thus undermine developing economies. Smaller countries, whose interests must be more narrowly defined, are always going to prioritize regional concerns over the more globally-oriented positions of the major world powers.
The most likely explanation for this behavior on the part of Washington is an attempt to shore up a dedicated “international community” that it can use to blunt the ambitions of revisionist powers like Russia and China. The problem with this approach, however, is that it breeds resentment and an even greater desire for pressured countries to break out of the U.S. orbit. This helps explain why an increasing number of states are considering dropping the dollar as the default global currency. When there are multiple options available, the least invasive one is usually considered the safest."