This had to be the dumbest possible phishing attack you could target Swan users with. Talk about not knowing your audience...
#m=image%2Fjpeg&dim=969x1280&blurhash=_6SPb3D%25%7EqofWVt7of%3Fct7WAofWBRkWB%3Fbt7xaoLIURjRj9FWB%3Fbt7M%7BayRjWVRjM_j%5Bxuj%5Bt79Fof%3FbWBM%7BWBRj%25MWBM%7Bj%5Boffkof%25MWBIUj%5Bs%3Aoet7xut7xuj%5BM%7BayM%7B&x=10f5a92d0c4d1004fe10044070948b4b87adfe69b07cd19d00d6da259ab2322b
I've tried many nonalcoholic beers and I actually prefer HopTea's Really Hoppy One.
If it has to be beer, I'd go with the NA Heineken.
Elevators in high rise buildings should use LIDAR or similar tech to continuously scan the interior to determine how much capacity is available. If the elevator is near capacity, it shouldn't stop at floors being requested by new passengers.
Nostr, much like Bitcoin, is more about censorship resistance than privacy.
Did the civil war get called off in favor of war with Iran?
Keep nostr weird!
It turns out that apparently no other clients support this file specific tagging that Amethyst does.
Should sex bot brothels be illegal? 🤔
In other stupid censorship news, the mods of the guns subreddit have informed us that merely mentioning the fact that you have purchased a firearm will get your account banned.
#m=image%2Fjpeg&dim=720x1087&blurhash=%5E27KuM%7EqIUxuIUWBRQ%252xuxut7ay4n%25Mxuj%5B%25Mjs%3Fbf6ofxuazofIURjt7WBt7t7D%25WUtRWVbHkC4nNGx%5BWVtRt79FRk%25MkCa%7Cj%40tRWUR*ofofWB&x=7c173843c9272fb80cbd274eaaacbe7dad641a4669af78697774b5c9e1c71ec7
Indeed, which is why censorship resistance is so important: you never know where the scale will tip when the powers that be can arbitrarily decide to censor content.
This note does not have a content warning. Guess it makes it an even better test of clients' moderation features! Quick everyone, mute nostr:nprofile1qy08wumn8ghj7mn0wd68yttsw43zuam9d3kx7unyv4ezumn9wshsz9thwden5te0wfjkccte9ejxzmt4wvhxjme0qyt8wumn8ghj7ur4wfcxcetjv4kxz7fwvdhk6tcqyrmj3k0xuuzgxk88pyc0tjnykzthwrvcnnxcdp20ucvwm2wg5wqsvwvmcme so his WoT score goes below zero.
Just kidding, but it does pose an interesting scenario: what if someone with high trust loses their mind? How quickly could they organically be demoted from people's feeds?
Right, I flagged the images as sensitive rather than the note. Sounds like there's a mismatch in expectations.
I suspect from what we've seen happen on other social networks, followers are incredibly sticky and even if someone goes insane, they won't meaningfully lose much of the attention directed toward them.
To be clear, I tagged the IMAGES as sensitive, not the note itself. Perhaps that doesn't work the way one would expect? Sounds like a question for nostr:npub1gcxzte5zlkncx26j68ez60fzkvtkm9e0vrwdcvsjakxf9mu9qewqlfnj5z
Someone commented that they were disappointed the Taylor Swift deepfakes aren't making rounds on nostr since it's a good test of censorship resistance. Challenge accepted!
Note that I'm marking these images as "sensitive" so your client ought to blur them by default. I'm also spreading the files across multiple hosts for redundancy.
Personally, I find it ridiculous that these particular deepfakes are what caused an uproar, because they're simply not believable due to the crowds in the background. When I was searching for Swift deepfakes I came across MANY older images that are far more realistic. But it just goes to show that you never know what will go viral.
#m=image%2Fjpeg&dim=643x599&blurhash=%3B8EA%5B%24wwK7TJJT%7EB%3Dyi%7BNwYPSe%23qnO-A-US%23J7%24i01bb5k9t-VE1ay-Ba%7D57xHx%5B%251FKNbozNbS%23%2C%5Brr%3Dy%252IpkDS2WVW%3BrDNGaKIowIIpM%7CsANG9tO%3FNaWUxtNGbHj%5BnitkozXSxuX8kWt7oys%3A&x=636ebca7541272de5d0515be8fa52701f7a831bab4d99c42134b7b4331dc84e1
I wonder if you can answer a simple question. Please interpret this phonetically: due ewe no wart the date ears?
#m=image%2Fjpeg&dim=1439x1437&blurhash=%7CaKA%7EoMx%3FKxtDiadt7oeV%40XXWYS%25ozNFRjt7WWayE1tQ9YWB%25Lofj%5DofR%25nzs%2BxYRis%3At7Rjj%3Fayx%3FkDocWWRkWXWVWBt7V%3BWBV%3Ft7xboMfPoJRj%25Kayt7a%7Ba%24fkWBWBa%23s*oMRif6Rkjsoeoft7%251oLoeWUogayaxofR*&x=6fa9c1025236fe9157dce6007df63b46e723686bf97bbc9ee4c0ad946e694e1e
Hey anon, are you prepping for war? Then you'll want to learn how to mask your signature from drones.
Remember: to be detected is to be targeted. To be targeted is to be killed.
https://2ndbn5thmar.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/SIGMAN-Camouflage-SOP.pdf
Watching "Break Point" and these tennis superstars are complaining that they have to avoid social media because people say mean things that make them doubt themselves.
Never would have guessed that world champions are so psychologically soft.
It seems that a recurring theme when exploring the edges of freedom of speech is that many folks believe that since speech can influence the thoughts and actions of those who consume it, we should consider second and third order effects of speech to be harm for which the original speaker is responsible.
I don't see how anyone can fit that concept into a workable framework that doesn't devolve to the point at which saying mean or critical things is equated to violence because hurting someone's feelings is harmful.
So you're saying it's subjective, not objective.
If generated nude images of young people who don't exist should be illegal, how would you objectively classify it as child porn? Since the subjects in the image don't have birthdays...