You have a great point lol.
An intentional product design flaw.
I'm struggling with it to be honest. I'm routinely sad about it.
I understand what you're saying. It's written clearly. The FAQ answers your questions and is clear about what you said was suss. Maybe other people aren't understanding what you're saying because of how you're communicating your thoughts. Am I really being shallow or accusatory? I never said you didn't read the FAQ. You also admitted that you didn't know Micay stepped down basically a year ago.
"Many other devices are supported by GrapheneOS at a source level, and it can be built for them without modifications to the existing GrapheneOS source tree."
Maybe you can help.
I impromptu interviewed a social engineering hacker. https://m.soundcloud.com/junsethsworld/interview-with-a-social-engineering
Great work.
Happy Mother's Day to nostr:npub1hu3hdctm5nkzd8gslnyedfr5ddz3z547jqcl5j88g4fame2jd08qh6h8nh
These are direct links to sections in the FAQ. Maybe you didn't read them before you created your original note.
Flatpak – a security nightmare – 2 years later (2020)
Comments ( https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40330816 )
What should you do?
nostr:note198jc6lmm0a4fhfaeuuah64dttql8wfr9f4ujr3cvjyx38t3632ssgm9aur
Didn't Micay step down? Have you read the FAQ? Do you think GrapheneOS is malicious?
This has happened to me several times. I refuse to try again.
Why does GrapheneOS run only on Google Pixel phones? Super suss if you ask me.
Because Google was founded as a DARPA/CIA operation, and Google is all about spying, control and censorship (google jigsaw). I am HIGHLY suspicious that GrapheneOS would only support Google phones. This maybe made a bit of sense initially if the Google phones had certain new security hardware features that other phones didn't have, and fully documented specs, but at this point that excuse is getting ridiculous. I suspect there is some hardware "watcher" in those things, low enough that you'll never detect or disable it, and they see everything though it. Huawei phones probably have a similar "watcher" that reports back to China.
I think we need another fork of AOSP, geared to run on different hardware from a neutral country: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_mobile_phone_brands_by_country
It's not that suss. Do you think GrapheneOS is malicious? Have you read the FAQ?
Checking this note out for a fren.
I thought cloud mining is when you're renting someone's infrastructure.
I didn't think it was cloud mining. It looked like selling existing infrastructure or handling the setup.
Where would you go? Personally, a lower cost of living and other factors makes some asian countries or the UAE attractive.
I'm also doubtful. That ship may have sailed a long time ago.
Good luck. Again, I disagree. I see where you're coming from though.
I think early Americans probably felt the same way. I agree to disagree. All hope isn't lost. We have work to do.
It will be interesting to see how it all plays out. I don't consider Satoshi a god. This isn't just his protocol.
I'm not a fan of running or all of us being in a central place. That seems like an easy target.
He is very clear. It needs to be at the protocol level.
We were recently made aware of multiple potential DNS leaks on Android. They stem from bugs in Android itself, and only affect certain apps. We have reported them to Google, and are working on fixes.
Read more: https://mullvad.net/blog/dns-traffic-can-leak-outside-the-vpn-tunnel-on-android
FFS
"Depending on your threat model this might mean that you should avoid using Android altogether for anything sensitive, or employ other mitigations to prevent the leaks. We aim to partially mitigate these problems in our app, so make sure to keep the app up-to-date."
There's always going to be some level of centralization and censorship. That isn't stopping Nostr from already being a better alternative.
It's like using the other fiat rails. There is still a risk. Your trade partner learns your name but the bank doesn't explicitly know you bought Bitcoin in the transaction.
It's good that we cant. It's an open permissionless network.
Tick tock, next block.
So Saylor’s plan to fight spam is to spam the nodes. 🙄
The orange check service looks to require a centralized server so inscribing to the chain is gratuitous.
This is shitcoins coming to Bitcoin. The comments on X are ridiculous.
https://x.com/bitcoinmagazine/status/1785795672345583834?s=46
Shitcoins are already on Bitcoin.
Where and how is he pushing inscriptions?
I would buy another one. It doesn't break the bank either.
