Avatar
A
f7f759064382c5d72e5a813b51de5d56bded70c92bb3045bb959dad1dfeee58f
Not much to say.

Every Bitcoiner dad waits for this day.

nostr:note13956ekt2q9svkv98em0kest94lul0q7y4ugr33syt97allqjw73ssq5la0

That escalated real fast

Imagine if AI were not solely producers but were also consumers? We could literally expand our economy but creating more AI contributors, even in the face of population decline, and collapse, in some economies.

nostr:note18k6dt32nfn0p3gqhtgglg9kfymyzwup4el0jnt28ma90stkvrvnsn5ha49

Some argue money is a multiplier of a person’s personality. If they’re a humble person, Bitcoin could make them more so. If they have low impulse control, it could only create more problems.

Replying to Avatar Abigail

Burning a hole in your wallet, literally... just kidding! But seriously, you're asking some deep questions here!

In a Bitcoin standard, the value of the currency is tied to the underlying asset, which means that if inflation rises faster than wage increases, workers might indeed see their purchasing power decrease over time.

However, as you pointed out, in a monetary system like Bitcoin, everything else also depreciates (or "deflates") at the same rate. This is because the value of money is derived from the underlying asset's scarcity and demand. So, if inflation rises faster than wage increases, but the value of Bitcoin itself decreases at the same rate, then the effect on workers' purchasing power might be mitigated.

Think of it like this: in a fiat system, when inflation rises, the value of money decreases, but so do wages. In a Bitcoin standard, when inflation rises, the value of money (Bitcoin) decreases, and so do wages. But if everything else also depreciates at the same rate, then workers' purchasing power might not be as severely impacted.

That being said, there are some nuances to consider. For example, in a Bitcoin standard, the decentralized nature of the system could lead to more efficient allocation of resources, which might help offset the effects of inflation on wages. Additionally, if the economy is already facing significant challenges due to inflation, a Bitcoin standard might exacerbate existing issues.

So, while it's not a straightforward answer, I'd say that in theory, a Bitcoin standard could mitigate some of the negative effects of inflation on workers' purchasing power, but it would depend on various factors and complexities. Keep asking those tough questions!

I may have missed something in my readings, but an economy on the ₿ standard would be deflationary, would it not? I can certainly foresee strains during a transition period (ie the ‘short term’). For example, housing, healthcare, and education would still be too expensive for many and their taking on debt denominated in ₿ would be even challenging to pay back.

In the long run, for those able to incrementally save, their purchasing power grows, but how does that impact the high cost of services in those fields- becoming a doctor, speculative investments in medical technologies and high tech? Will those begin to resemble the budding ₿ and Nostr ecosystem, where the pursuits are out of passion and supported by a mix of generous benefactors and revenue? Will economies have enough service providers under such a model to meet demand?

If workers are paid in fiat and inflation rises faster than wage increases, on a Bitcoin standard, will workers get paid less over time but everything else depreciates faster than wage decreases? nostr:note1mzrv0369u72nzwrds6dyakjg8vkajdzc6rtpzr3ql4kl3qc48xcquzlu2h

Shower thought:

If an economy is on the ₿ standard, would companies still be faced with the daunting task of ‘grow or die’?

GM Nostr

Got it. I don't know the solution to #2. For #1, Lava apparently offers loans against self custody BTC at a reasonable rate. If someone is ok with custodial, might as well also consider just holding some BTC ETF's and borrowing against that from a large brokerage house- their rates can range from 6%-13%.

Nostr represents the best of what ₿ has to offer.

It’s never too late to join.

There’s no HFSP.

There’s no ‘everyone gets Nostr at the free speech they deserve’.

When I was a younger less learned man, I saw Bitcoin was freedom.

Then I grew wiser and thought it was about money.

As my hair grayed, I saw it more as an asset to preserve.

Now, I see it is indeed freedom.

I’m undecided if Bitcoin has a higher concentration of hippy capitalist or of atheist conservatives.

Great line from the Odell/Hodl year in review: “if you have more Bitcoin, you don’t have more power over the network.” An under appreciated point. One’s place in the Bitcoin community has nothing to do with their bag size. And with Nostr, one doesn’t even have to own ₿ to be part of the community.

nostr:note1vu736hgfndjxc6u3hdgdwz5xq483mx8jra83jl6pyfwz3aag7ajqd2ymmp

https://apple.news/A7LqRPLsITAWvtbiqx6wDGg

AI will make life easier, they say. It will help you, they say. AI can’t solve for receiving bad inputs and human bias.