Not here. This place is full of psychopaths and autists.

They’re weird. But beautiful is a bit of a stretch.

nostr:nevent1qqs2er36936tz24sh8ve6esfe4tnm06gkl8evatxsg2g6svu5932a4qzyzmejmqc8cpkmuncq229hq9mmj9shavhrdnzr2rt7dtfcvepzlc86qcyqqqqqqgpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduvu0mtx

If the Silk Road had been built today, would it be built on top of Nostr?

https://x.com/dragonbowtied/status/1904601889209208882?s=46

Seeing the Internet of Money ideas play out in real time today, years after they were published, is a bit wild. Andreas is ahead of his time.

∞ / (21M - L) is how to accurately measure Bitcoin.

There’s a fundamental misunderstanding of its supply. It’s not a limited supply of 21M, it’s a declining supply from 21M.

No more than 21M will ever be made, but that means the coins that are lost (L) forever, are never replaced.

This means Bitcoin isn’t deflationary, it’s hyper-deflationary. Everything doesn’t get cheaper measured against Bitcoin, everything gets much cheaper.

∞ / (21M - L)

https://x.com/walkeramerica/status/1902834373394632773?s=46

Credit to nostr:npub1cj8znuztfqkvq89pl8hceph0svvvqk0qay6nydgk9uyq7fhpfsgsqwrz4u for the original post.

The Tardis is always bigger than it looks.

This guy sounds like someone with sensory issues with fabrics and falls somewhere on the spectrum.

Also sounds like how 90% of how guys live before women and children.

Read the book “Autonomy: The Quest to Build the Driverless Car―And How It Will Reshape Our World”

nostr:nevent1qqsy3kc363czfhrksagj0f8wywj37zqkwztwu95767h5ejpewzhmpugzypxhsss9z7pwp5l7kq6dz59dc2mt4e8w8dyhseunhlaydzm0twttxqcyqqqqqqgpp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mqjnlg4h

That SUCKS

Citadel?

The language used is not suitable for noobs. Simplify each one even more so for an audience that doesn’t know the significance of each of those.

What is a nutzap? What is eCash?

1) Happiest place on the internet. Even the toxicity is out of love. GM, GN, GFY.

2) Easiest way to find and pay someone. A global directory for Bitcoin Lightning Network.

3) Alternative economic model to the exploitive gatekeepers for content creators. Musicians can be paid directly by their audience (Fountain/Wavlake). So can podcasters, content creators, etc.

4) it’s uncontrollable. Can’t be censored. DYI algorithms. No shadow banning. Can’t be bankrupted.

5) Growth is in the value/user rather than eyeballs. Even if user count remains flat, the value of the zaps go up infinitely in the long run.

Bonus: It’s the only place to go to for a social network. Everything else is social media.

(Un)shared hallucinations?

Do you mind elaborating for those of us in the back of the class?

I wish for a world where Bitcoin can make war irrelevant before the mass production of killer robots.

If not, then at least preserve the right for personal defense robots under the second amendment.

I can never do justice to the stories around exemplars who epitomized Bitcoin’s money-is-free-speech value proposition. I’ll share just two from recent memory:

Julian Assange- a publisher who gave a voice to those who speak truth to power;

Canadian Truckers- Western world citizens were all put on notice that fiat in bank accounts are licensed and not owned.

It doesn’t matter if you agree with what they had done, or with what the government had done, Bitcoin saved those who were unpopular, and isn’t that what speech is about?

Let’s be honest, what social network that hyper focused on catering to content creators didn’t end up just killing the culture?

LinkedIn: “My servant fucked up, but I showed them I am a merciful master”

Quora: “I learned to wipe my own ass last week. Does this mean I have a high IQ?”

Instagram: “OF link in my bio”

Tinder: also, “OF link in my bio”

X/Twitter: “I have a big announcement that I’m going announce next week. I’ll reveal more in my thread below. It’s all fucking signal!”

Nostr is real people posting about real things, and conversations happening. Most who attempt to be creators/influencers do not have real conversations. It’s fucking un-human.

Medical records protocol. You want them verifiable, sovereign to the patient, BUT unlike ₿, you don’t want the information public to the world. Would be more like eCash or a fedimint, where a select group have access (patient, care providers, authorized representatives) to the underlying data.

nostr:nevent1qqsvmge0ae2r86lju3j2eu5qgmulplq664et7a5gl327l2nuy8c2vuqzyz8u96egf4t0pkshxcu9ts02uhy7gj92kutm3s5v9gd54vqlspzz7qcyqqqqqqg6j7ufh