Subnostr

Hanshan

f985d309197c805e1719c73185b574fc3ee407d7c1b6157dee99c6ace2599bbb

People improve through making mistakes. Free people make their mistakes faster. Nostrich since 761114.

https://i.delta.chat/#78310EF328F159EFE775A28825A2125A63B29A82&i=_PHJkyCSLiClxlfClbZ_YEsf&s=PLN35q3PzlCN9pReXkPNWUVm&a=hanshan%40hanshan.io&n=Hanshan

🎃 Stark +053 (Fearful) 🏴‍☠️

There are better ways to have both privacy and a simple way to audit the supply like Bitcoin.

My idea of a privacy coin would work something like this:

1. Have a network of relay nodes constantly running symmetric data streams for uniformity, randomly routing data through the network in broken-up chunks

2. Have every minimum unit of the currency (every "Satoshi" equivalent) be its own keypair. When a user signs a transaction, it tells the network to generate new keypairs for each one in the transaction and give the recipient the new private keys

3. The public can see the pubkeys for every unit of the currency, but can't see which ones were and weren't transacted together in each block, because of each node in the network transmitting data in separate split-up chunks along random paths

sounds basically unscalable and hell for wallet sync

Ou of band, sort of like taproot and musig schnorr that always look like singlesig on-chain?

nono sorry wasnt clear

you have use the cli wallet to export the partially signed tx and import it into the other wallet signers

its a huge UI hassle and nobody does it

if interested:

https://monerodocs.org/multisignature/

Most markets are moving to only use monero.

there's still plenty of BTC usage on dnms

Versus had a nice multisig setup before they were compromised.

Monero does not have multisig, right?

If trustless escrows are only feasible on bitcoin, that might be a reason for it to make a comeback.

multisig on monero requires out of band signing.

the necessity will be eliminated in the Seraphis update (coming soon ™)

sorry i cant help it

yours is working too 😍

sorry i cant help it

Because Zaps are branded as bitcoin lightning payments with NIP-57 and therefore it will be confusing when people start talking about shitcoin specific zaps.

But hey, nostr is a permissionless protocol. Go build the world you want to live in.

I agree different terms are necessary.

if only because monero zaps could observe 1st principles and be noncustodial

this new generation of nostr users are growing up thinking custodial solutions are normal

I'd be open to calling dogecoin tips "yaps" but I don't really see a reason zaps couldn't simply include a few different choices of currency for users to enter addresses on & send/receive

yeah if anyone cared about doge that might be cool

Replying to Change this if you want

Chicago isn’t a good one ?

lol

should be fine right?

different problem then mine then.

different OS too

sorry. install matrix?

Replying to Change this if you want

Yes iPhone ! I already have esim thats the second one

you have to be in an area with good coverage

Not that I'm aware of. Zaps is defined by NIP-57 so if someone want to do a new NIP "zaps-like behaviour" for a shitcoin, I think it would be smart to give it a different name to not confuse users.

there is an active bounty for Monero zaps and Cake wallet is working on it as well

there has been discussion about nomenclature

Replying to Change this if you want

You had activating status ? And nothing has happened ?

iphone right?

and you are activating for the first time?

are you in an area with good coverage?

Replying to Change this if you want

Have a bad experience with a silent.link ! Says activating and nothing happens 🤬

i had some trouble getting mine trained up last week.

their support on matrix was excellent.

dunno if this link will work for you https://matrix.to/#/!PPgTMIUsMvbrkwQmaW:monero.social?via=monero.social&via=silent.link

Secretary Janet Yellen

So you still can't explain how you can censor my LN transaction, can't link to the "exploit" you mentioned. Like the true shirtcoin shill you are. Keep attacking #Bitcoin like a little retard, keep helping the fiat side. I honestly don't care. Your shirtcoin with a temporary privacy feature won't be the new #Bitcoin anyway.

You're correct, everybody with a brain knows the #LightningNetwork is still being developed and it's far from the final product. If there's a bug, it'll get fixed. Now go ahead and read about the upcoming hardfork your leaders decided to set for you. Goodbye shill 🤙💜

bitcoin maxis need someone to explain how centralized custodial services can be censored

smdh

nostr:nevent1qqsfm6ymwupwm2w4cmx0m9xztpe539q7e4m4nepfzl4wh6xdgar7ergpr4mhxue69uhkummnw3ez6ur4vgh8wetvd3hhyer9wghxuet5qgsypm84ndtqpxqnafxrpqd3nkw4yhmkm0e9rfdq8zd5h638cwntnrcrqsqqqqqp28q55f

Centralized LSP user asserts his transactions are uncensorable

and in other retarded takes

https://tftc.io/lightning-bugs-and-regulatory-attacks-on-bitcoin/

lol

"can you link the exploit?"

anybody with a brain knows LN hasn't been stress tested yet

nostr:nevent1qqsxt9da2gfk9wknm08hnvtvkjpnl3es6es4qy6e6aejekwh9txs78cpzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumn0wd68ytnzv9hxgq3qdergggklka99wwrs92yz8wdjs952h2ux2ha2ed598ngwu9w7a6fsxpqqqqqqzfyc3lt

Secretary Janet Yellen

Don't put words into my mouth, shirtcoin shill.

I just said if I use #Bitcoin LN correctly, my sent txs are private. Your cope with this statement is unbelievable.

You used three notes, hundreds of words, yet did not explain what I've asked for.

Can you link to the "exploit"?

Centralized LSP user asserts his transactions are uncensorable

and in other retarded takes

https://tftc.io/lightning-bugs-and-regulatory-attacks-on-bitcoin/

Secretary Janet Yellen

That's not an explanation, just a made up statement of a shitcoin shill.

When used properly, #Bitcoin #LN is for the sender 100% private. You know that already.

If cash is fungible, tell me why there are serial numbers on the bills. Again, before using big words, read the definition first 🤙💜

cash is fungible becasue the movement of the serial numbers arent published on a public ledger anyone with a web browser can audit

utxos are. this isnt complicated.

Secretary Janet Yellen

That's not an explanation, just a made up statement of a shitcoin shill.

When used properly, #Bitcoin #LN is for the sender 100% private. You know that already.

If cash is fungible, tell me why there are serial numbers on the bills. Again, before using big words, read the definition first 🤙💜

"for the sender" and "when used properly" is doing all the work in that post.

and you're still not private from your routing node.

not to mention the exploit that was just published.

fact is, LN has not been tested in an adversarial environment yet.

you're the shill who can't think critically about the tools you use.

this is just stock "my node doesnt discriminate therefore its fungible" maxi cope

Secretary Janet Yellen

Bitcoin is fungible, read a definition before using big words. Go ahead and explain how exactly is somebody censoring my #Bitcoin transactions on LN?

LN is not private. You are comparing apples to oranges.

and if BTC fungible, why does the mempool keep getting clogged with ordinals?

rights are not granted - rights are taken and defended

lotta "muh natural rights" cope in these mentions

Load More