Dont search.
Instead just see reality as it is.
When we see that all forms are empty, how could they be limiting?
Who exactly would be confined?
冬至当夜？
We always have a party. Looking forward to the longer days already...
yeah fr
what about transactional privacy?
are we fine with those being totally transparent?
seems obvious by omission.
not if they want to continue having a relationship with the seller they cant.
human relationships are usually more than transactional and therefore they dont end when the transaction is completed.
you know
i come into maxi threads to share my view,
about privacy
about NGU mentality
misunderstanding UoA
arbitrary little technical details people might find annoying
but I def dont just crash in and start calling everyone a faggot
just saying...
why are you so concerned about faggotry 🤨
just run a LN node instead and you can avoid all that trouble!
TBF at this point we were thinking they had bought a quantity of stock and were reselling that
at least I was anyway
this is nostr:npub1yxp7j36cfqws7yj0hkfu2mx25308u4zua6ud22zglxp98ayhh96s8c399s suggesting that #monero has a UX problem because a TARGETED attack by a SOPHISTICATED attacker sending a custom transaction *could link together ownership of two different subaddresses (if the monero user had shared both of them with the adversary of course)
meanwhile
in the VAST majority of the ways LN is actually used,
ALL your sends and receives are trivially known by someone to belong to a single entity.
because you're using a custodian. or you only have one or two fat channels with a LSP.
what to do to get transaction unlinkability??
no problem!
Just run a full-stack #Bitcoin lightning routing node! Open lots of channels and tie up your liquidity while fees are low!
You can establish plausible deniability for your LN txs and not have to worry if the FBI is sending custom txs to link your monero subaddresses together. easypeasy!
anyone who has run a LN node can confirm you can just "set-it and forget it."
Just like making a monero node available over tor!
ok. I'm done.
lol
I'll leave it to you
and pop up to explain why STN is full of shit
a video about why a monopoly on mining
like you describe
is incompatible with a free economic system
why are you getting so defensive?
pretty sure I saw this exact Tweet in 2016
except it was bitcoin
He's alright 😂
i thought maybe he was hassling you to accept monero.
replied to the wrong note here 😅
gasoline?!
i had no idea those even existed...
uh
who showed up in whose mentions to sling some shit, gloat about blocking first and bounce?
but hey
i get it,
gotta flag wave for the boyz so you can hang in the circle jerk
nobody who has even done both of these thinks they are equivalent ,
and you look dumb suggesting they are similar.
you can tell these people over and over about ZK proofs and the additional complexity required for #monero supply audit
and they'll still just jump on the next thread and bleat the same maxi talking point 🙄
no intellectual curiosity, just blind flag-waving
SMDH
its a logical jump from "integrating with the legacy system
to
"replacing the legacy system"
youll notice guys like Booth treat the idea of "integrate then replace" as some mechanical, or predetermined thing.
but gloss over the details.
start with a gram ❤️
you build up to the 5g trip after you find your legs a bit
impossible to know since nobody runs a node either
its easy to scale when you have zero usage
what that looks like in practice is Bcash
no Segwit, larger blocks
its being driven by speculative investment.
those deep pockets want more USD, not Bitcoin.
relationships are hard
but its good that he tries 😊
if measuring things in dollars is an illusion,
what reliable measurement are you using to measure % return of gold?
not sure what that could mean
pretty sure it will be some function of joules/hash
how will the purchasing power of a sat be determined?