hey nostr:npub1nlch0l8fj86x4ew2f5kxdn4q3vwmprkz0v7hsm9vcry62xee683qmqq7ay I think, by mistake, you set your nostr client to zap continuously this note.
Man... no need to stream sats to me for this. Hold your sats !
That's why we have to build local bitcoin circular economies and stop using fiat. In a bitcoin circular economy they cannot take your BTC as reserve asset.
I was talking about this here:
REVOCATION OF ELECTION processes to remove people from the Federal Taxation system
States are CORPORATIONS!
You do not fight gov / IRS by avoiding or hiding.
You fight by rebut any of his "authority".
YOU ARE NOT A PERSON!
The most pathetic moment in the history of BTC conferences
Wake up people!
IRS is a scam ! https://video.nostr.build/94cfe89143568eaa9808ab18d0d2c5fe76992ec6acda3a18e386031f2e85a261.mp4
hey nostr:nprofile1qythwumn8ghj7cnfw33k76twv4ezuum0vd5kzmp0qyg8wumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytnddakj7qgnwaehxw309ahkvenrdpskjm3wwp6kytcpzemhxue69uhk2er9dchxummnw3ezumrpdejz7qgwwaehxw309ahx7uewd3hkctcpremhxue69uhkummnw3ez6ur4vgh8wetvd3hhyer9wghxuet59uq36amnwvaz7tmwdaehgu3wvf5hgcm0d9hx2u3wwdhkx6tpdshszxnhwden5te0dehhxarj9ejx2cm9de6x7mne9e3k7mf0qyv8wumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytnxd46zuamf0ghxy6t69uq36amnwvaz7tmwdaehgu3wd46hg6tw09mkzmrvv46zucm0d5hsqg9x5gk43km8p85pc4chve7mackahtpzgjzhtk4ljt6txrrwuyff7yfz4spd when a podcast episode with meme contest debate / review ?
Some of them never... and they will just die, clueless and poor.
And they said we want Bitcoin mass adoption, Bitcoin for everyone...
The purpose of the US Con_stitution was to dupe the people into imagining legitimacy to a new ruling class.
The Con_stitution is not "ours". It never was. It was a lie from day one, designed to give the illusion of "representation" and "consent".
The lie worked so well that it was heavily copied in the con_stitutions of the worst tyrannies in history (red Chine, USSR, N.Korea etc). And yes, I used to revere the document too. It took me a long time to accept what it is. It is the arch enemy of freedom, not its protector.
"Writing petitions to politicians is meaningless and useless.
Those are NOT your "representatives" in any way."
This is a self-fulfilling prophecy. If they have no idea what we think or know, they can't possibly represents us. Neither can the public record, which is useful when politicians pushing agendas claim they didn't know their policy would have predictably bad results.
It's also demonstrably untrue. E2EE message scanning in Chat Control was voted down by EU politicians, as nostr:nprofile1qqs2ggm7ggxdkzejx8ghrl58n09wx73dk74l9uf2xdaew5ehvxxr4sspz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumt0wd68ytnsw43qzxthwden5te0wfjkccte9eeks6t5vehhycm99ehkuegprfmhxue69uhkummnw3ezucm0d9hxvatwv35hgtnrdakszl3pnh says, because of all the experts who communicated with those politicians. Net neutrality was restored in the US for the same reason.
So anyone who says communicating your views to politicians is pointless is a) wrong, or b) a shill or Useful Idiot for the people who want to push stuff like Link Taxes and Chat Control through legislatures without resistance. Or both.
A petition is a formal written request, typically one signed by many people, appealing to “authority” in respect of a particular cause.
However in most cases, when you sign a petition you have inadvertently accepted the obligation of the very thing you are petitioning against, when in fact you may have had no obligation in the first place, as there was no lawfully binding contract to begin with.
Meaning the subject or cause you are petitioning against did not even apply to you, but through the very action of petitioning, now it does.
This is why most petitions against the “government” are actually set up by the very “government” you are “petitioning” against.
Note: a petition is an “appeal” which means in simple terms “begging”. You have lost your sovereign status and become subservient to a higher authority.
For example: If you petition against changes made to the “Human Rights Act” then you have accepted that “contract” or corporate policy, and are now bound by it, when it never even applied to you.
You have now agreed that your rights no longer belong to you, but are now controlled by the people who have written the “Human Rights Act”, who now have the power to change them at will. You have become a slave.
A lawful petition can only exist where a standing agreed upon contract already applies.
For example: If a group of people all sign a contract to work for a corporation, and the management of said corporation then “change the deal”, the group of people could “petition” against the changes to an existing contract.
However if you are petitioning against a change in policy regarding a contract your are obligated by, remember regardless of how many people signed said petition, the overall document is only considered as one voice and only carries the weight of “one person” in court.
Therefore it would be better to sue the management for breach of contract than petition, that way the workers retain their sovereign status.
Note: Most unions will not tell the workers this, and are usually working with the very corporation the union said they would protect the worker against.
Petitions are also set up and offered by governments to defuse a situation where the people are angry over a certain issue said government caused.
The way this works is those who sign have a sense they are acting against the issue and therefore are making a difference, when in fact they have not, and hence do not take the matter any further.
In short, only children or slaves beg, make appeals and petition.
"Writing petitions to politicians is meaningless and useless.
Those are NOT your "representatives" in any way."
This is a self-fulfilling prophecy. If they have no idea what we think or know, they can't possibly represents us. Neither can the public record, which is useful when politicians pushing agendas claim they didn't know their policy would have predictably bad results.
It's also demonstrably untrue. E2EE message scanning in Chat Control was voted down by EU politicians, as nostr:nprofile1qqs2ggm7ggxdkzejx8ghrl58n09wx73dk74l9uf2xdaew5ehvxxr4sspz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumt0wd68ytnsw43qzxthwden5te0wfjkccte9eeks6t5vehhycm99ehkuegprfmhxue69uhkummnw3ezucm0d9hxvatwv35hgtnrdakszl3pnh says, because of all the experts who communicated with those politicians. Net neutrality was restored in the US for the same reason.
So anyone who says communicating your views to politicians is pointless is a) wrong, or b) a shill or Useful Idiot for the people who want to push stuff like Link Taxes and Chat Control through legislatures without resistance. Or both.
The truth is one who seeks to achieve freedom by petitioning those in power to give it to him has already failed, regardless of the response.
To beg for the blessing of "authority" is to accept that the choice is the master's alone to make, which means that the person is already by definition, a slave...
