🕎Happy Hanukkah to all who celebrate it🕎

Dear Santa,

A fun, good paying job💫

I am not Spanish, I don’t speak Spanish, I am not engaging with Spanish X,

Why is my feed all in Spanish?

Unbelievable dead Twitter

Lunch time

« The sooner you realize people be on coke, the less you take things personally. »

Human rights advocates doesn’t get involved in culturally, ethically, or religiously inappropriate acts.

Be careful with who are you dealing with. What you see on the surface might be the exact opposite.

To which degree?

Here it is,

The inappropriate calls for mating both religiously and culturally.

Isn’t mating the ultimate purpose of human existence?

If yes, to which degree?

Or, shouldn’t it be considered this way?

If calls for mating is religiously and culturally appropriate, why is it considered inappropriate when expressed in extreme levels?

Some people might argue that discipline makes it more acceptable to do so

But, isn’t the call for mating itself religiously and culturally an act of disorder when done by females regardless?

What they all have in common is that when males calls for mating it is called religiously appropriate, and when females call for mating it is called culturally appropriate.

Some cultures have made it conservatively acceptable to call for mating within their religious borderlines, some others have made it conservatively acceptable to call for mating within their cultural borderlines.

Asians, Middle Easterns and Africans X has something in common: they are very sexually oriented in too many different levels.

Unfortunately, from my side, there is no way to fix that.

And if one is always responsible for making it look like there is something (which is deeply disturbing) and the other always trying to explain the non existence theory, they’re simply giving those sick in the head people the authority to make a point.