Rumble's response to the UK Parliament's letter to CEO Chris Pavlovski
Hmmmmm - I don‘t know the truth about the attacks and allegations on Russel Brand - but is it conspiracy theory if I think there‘s something „fishy“ ? 
The extradition has nothing to do with Trump or US elections. ZERO - It‘s all about the Manning Leaks.
Thank You Jesse ♥️
Free Assange NOW
https://jesseventura.substack.com/p/cutting-through-the-propaganda?utm_campaign=post
Welcome to the happy land, Julia - nice to have such beauty on nostr deck.
🌼🌼🌼
At the moment - I don’t think so. It was available on ITV. I‘ll let you know when it‘s available on another channel.
HELLO!! my sister indoctrinated me towards bitcoin so here I am !!! Curious to see how this works !! 
Welcome to the happy land 🌺🌼🌷🪻
Hacking Justice / Clara Lopez Rubio 
It's now or never:
Free Assange!
#FreeAssange
I can see it too.
Note to myself:
PUBLISH something the MIT and CIA don‘t like and they are able to switch off the rules of law, no matter where you are in the world.
1st Amendment won‘t apply to you as you Austrian and won’t protect you from U.S. torture supermax prisons.
Assange extradition sets the precedent.
🥵 #FreeAssange!
https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2023/09/the-slow-motion-execution-of-julian-assange/
Can’t wait for the milk to arrive 🧡
nostr:npub1hu3hdctm5nkzd8gslnyedfr5ddz3z547jqcl5j88g4fame2jd08qh6h8nh
#grownostr 
Exciting time, isn’t? - Both of you are shining bright - gorgeous!❤️
Why did all judges ignore written testimony of Swiss Prof. Grotthof which says clearly that Wikileaks re-published?
The unredacted data was out already on a U.S. server before WL published them. Young was never asked to take the Website down and was never confronted with any charges.
Harding & LeIgh published the password in theIr book.
Prosecutor quoted from their book at the extradition hearings.
Why didn’t they have to testify about the password?
According to UK law, extradition should have been refused.
Re-publication is not a crime in the UK.
The Assange Lawyers explained also a precedent specifically involving Cryptome (p. 141 in the HC appeal) which had named a British spy in the IRA before the newspapers.
How can judges simply ignore all these facts? 