haha I just noticed I did that to your reply… sorry! Agree with the feedback on making it clearer in the UX
Had read about it a couple of times but didn’t join until #[4] ‘s tweet about Damus
can you link to the video please? 🙏
yep, given how many sats are out there, it seems very unlikely that more than a fraction will matter more than BTC’s fungibility, so I think we’ll find a natural equilibrium. And the fraction that will, will reduce supply of “fungible BTC” thus increasing the price.
I think it’s a matter of who cares and what’s the use case. If the value of the Bitcoin network keeps rising, the people who care about transferring value across the internet will outweigh those that care about the value associated to a sat. Essentially, if no one really cares about the uniqueness of your sat, it returns back to fungibility, correct?
Can you point to some of the companies working on it?
I know a lot of people here don’t approve, but what’s the best podcast on #ordinals so far?
Yes. Google “Apple tattoo” and you will not find more than a handful of people who have tattooed the logo of the most iconic company of our time. Then google “Bitcoin tattoo”… fanatics indeed
Thank you, very helpful! Do you mind exploring in one sentence how you use each of the categories (colored sections)?
This is something I have been asking about. I’ve been told that you don’t take your followers with you which, if true is not ideal because it creates huge moats for individual clients
