Avatar
The Conscious Contrarian
fe775b05e9d8c1d6f6ba13670a45d5504d2f14df43815dc52423e4f2ec62eeae
The Conscious Contrarian challenges conventional wisdom to uncover new, more attuned principles and perspectives for navigating the future.

We should get in the habit, when using this protocol of not uttering everything that comes into our head but to select more carefully.

Holding the community hostage through sheer volume of content won’t be rewarded here, quality will be.

Agree with your overall take here.

But to be honest, it’s also good to know that there’s redundancy for a cable whose traffic can be controlled by government actors or which could be subject to terrorism.

I’m not sure how likely either of those scenarios are, but we have certainly seen stranger things.

With Bitcoin and nostr comes an ethical responsibility to rise above the toxic rhetoric and hysteria of the Fiat discourse.

Let’s remind newcomers and each other that we’re not going to stoop to their level.

Replying to Avatar Lyn Alden

Too many people have given Elon a pass. Don't give him a pass.

He's a marketer, not a founder or an engineer. He didn't found PayPal or Tesla; he bought into them early. He's good at selling narratives and equity valuation for perpetually unprofitable companies.

Everything for him is a narrative. His green revolution was a narrative to sell more cars and get more subsidies. His bitcoin purchase was to gain appeal among bitcoin/crypto people in a bull market. And he shilled doge like a dumbass. His SpaceX narrative is to get money from the government.

His rooftop solar thing was an outright scam; the technology isn't ready and went nowhere because of that. His full-self-driving-in-an-intermediate-term timeline was a scam, and is going nowhere because of that. He makes scams to draw people and capital in, because for him it's all about narratives and equity valuation.

And then he dug unproductive holes, suggested unproductive hyper-tubes, built meme flamethrowers, for what? It's a narrative, not a business. None of this is real productive shit to make peoples' lives better.

His latest "we need free speech" narrative was a scam too. He tapped into something real, which is what marketers do and why it kind of worked. Yes, we need free speech. Yes, Twitter had censorship issues. He saw that and jumped on it maliciously rather than productively.

But what did he replace it with? He replaced it with arbitrary journalist censorship about his private jet, arbitrary censorship of Substack, selective Twitter Files release, won't talk seriously about any of his China connections because Xi Jinping fucking owns him economically there like Jack Ma, has his balls firmly in his grasp, etc.

Elon's playing the narrative, the anti-woke meme of the day. He's a master meme-momentum-player. Don't fall for it.

Yep and to prove your point (and raise cash) Elon just dumped Dogecoin on some lost fools.

Don’t forget, you can easily add https://Nostr.Report to your homescreen for easy access! #[0]​ did an incredible job with the site, both the mobile and web versions look awesome.

And what’s Plebchain radio?

Don’t forget, you can easily add https://Nostr.Report to your homescreen for easy access! #[0]​ did an incredible job with the site, both the mobile and web versions look awesome.

This is awesome, thanks! Zap ⚡️

Replying to Avatar Gigi

Very crisp thinking. The importance of money for distributed cognition is underestimated.

Some thoughts on insurance:

Health, car and other insurances in their current inefficient form seem to be predominantly a Fiat phenomenon.

I rented a car today and decided against insuring it because the cost of insuring would have been almost as high as the cost of renting the car.

Needless to say I’m taking a risk here but doing the math and provided a total write-off doesn’t bankrupt me, it feels like a rational decision.

It has the additional positive effect that I’m far more careful and responsible than I would otherwise be with the car.

Of course insurances have their validity in distributing risk but in their current scammy and expensive form, I’m increasingly inclined to avoid them.

Great post. I agree with you on Bitcoin’s superiority as a store of value vs real estate.

Independent of that, just curious why you don’t think tokenization of real estate adds any value? I need to think more about this but are you suggesting it just doesn’t provide a lot of extra value compared to traditional “custody” and “transfer” abilities of Real Estate?