GM. π
GM!
I am declaring this Friday a 'bring your kid to work day'.
Let's see how long they can keep up with it, if not my weekend starts early π€.
We are ready to rock π€ 
#coffeechain
GM. Great wake up call π π€ β
Maybe should buy the normal chicken, not the X-rated one π€ππΆβπ«οΈ

That is the most interesting about V4V imm: it brings with it cognitive spending, or maybe aware consuming.
The payer is more mindful of the subjective value of the good/service offered.
Posting on Nostr is a bit like a street performance... You do it because you like doing it,... Sometimes you get a smile in return and sometimes a dime.
Expecting a zap (over a like or other emoticon) because you put a lot of work in your post/meme is Marxist,
expecting zaps because you want to make a living from your posts is Keynesian,
If your work is really that (objectively) good, you trust the 'market' (Nostr users) to find (subjective) value in what you make and will zap you accordingly.
Nost users NOT using a lightning address on Nostr (removing possibility to zap) is more objective signal than someone sending a zap (which is subjective signal).
Now going a bit meta: I found value in the meme I link to this note, so I would like to zap the maker, but I had to find it in a search engine.
If you are able to keyword your memes in such a way that I can find it again, to use when I feel the need for it, I would zap for sure π€.
Because at that moment it does have objective value, which I want to subjectivly reciprocate.
If you make it easy searchable as a dev, with the option to "Zap to copy to note" it is also fully justified to take a % per use, because you created value for consumer(clarifying point the consumer wants to make to their audience) and creator of meme.
Feel free to fight me on my #NostrPhilosophy π I might zap you.

My daughter says it is an owl, so it must be an owl.
This whole conversation got me spiraling on the difference between signal, communication and value π
There is a huge difference in Nostr clients, so again there is the communication channel that influences the message on which the sender of the 'signal' doesn't have any influence.
The absence of an element of communication can be the communication π€
π πΆβπ«οΈ π€―
So now I see shitcoins as "can be useful" but "not worth anything".
π€
nostr:note138f7j0qlgdft5nnthzux3526xqn9nc5w9737fhac9uuufvgk4gjse4f6wk
Today I went to work early, after 8 hours went home to go swim with my kids. After the swim went back to work another 4 hours.
At work, in between tasks, stacked a modest amount of Sats.
Just finished a cocktail my son made for me.
GN Nostr. Life is good.
Selling your Sats directly to a friend on the other hand is showing love π§‘ π
Are you insulting my car? π€
So is the subtext verifiable? https://ungovernablemisfits.com/shop/gameboy-mining/





