Avatar
7Bluerabbits
ff8b76609f545257e470f1817f0a42defd69cbc902757cc7f79a4988a13c17be
THE Most accurate Bitcoin Power Consumption - CO2 emissions - ewaste estimate. Dispelling Climate FUD about #Bitcoin - ends forced investment in climate destruction. Bought 0 Fossil Fs in 6y Hence 2.4 tCO2/year. EV driver, non flying, meat eater. X Extinction Rebellion. Not a lefty. Home node, mine BTC for heating. NošŸ’©coins. uk šŸ‡¬šŸ‡§ā›ļøKnots

Hi, somethings screwy with your profile. I’m only seeing 1 (me) sometimes 2 followers and zero relays. You may need to add some more relays, 20-30 is good number.

Cheers

7Bluerabbits

Fully Charged Show discus the FUD surrounding #EV s

#stopburningstuff #climateemergency

https://youtu.be/F4ycEfIiIRc?feature=shared

Replying to Avatar Keith

I have three rebuttals and two comments.

1. I understand economy of scale. However, since the app didn’t ask any questions about lifestyle or product use it probably treats all people the same or, most likely, ignores lifestyle as a factor. Which, IMHO, is one of the most important factors.

2. ā€œEvery gallon of fuel used makes ā‰ˆ 3 x its weight in COā‚‚ ā€œ This is impossible. The output of a thing cannot be greater than the sum of its inputs. That’s not how math, physics or the universe works. Just think about it for a moment. Or did I misunderstand?

3. Current EV’s do not have the power/range/capacity to fulfill my needs. Additionally, they are just to heavy. An electric F150 Lightning weighs 35% more than the gas powered model. Making it impractical for off-road use.

Finally, have you ever seen a lithium mine? Talk about raping the earth! We are just trading one form of pollution for another. The pictures included are from a lithium mine in California. I’m not advocating for gas powered vehicles. I actually think Hydrogen is the future. But that cuts the mining industry (wether it’s oil or lithium) out of the picture, so it was never developed. After all, money talks louder than the environment.

Remember, we are not just trying to reduce our carbon emissions, but all pollution is bad. We all need clean air to breathe and clean water to drink. I hope my statements and facts educated you and that you think about the whole production cycle when making purchasing decisions. A ā€œone size fits allā€ approach to pollution and climate change can not solve the problem. But rather educating individuals and leading them to a better lifestyle is our best hope.

First I showed you mine, now you show me yours (carbon footprint as independently judged by the @earthhero app)

1 ā€œlifestyleā€ & ā€œopinionā€ are not scientific terms. You are not green simply because you live in the country.

2 CO2 - Carbon + Oxygen + Oxygen is roughly 3 times heavier than just Carbon. Basic physics.

3 Hydrogen 🄓 Horribly inefficient. This is just the oil industry trying to stay relevant. Hydrogen derived from Methane (steam reformation) is more fossil fuel with even more inefficiency. The waste CO2 with be pumped into old oil wells to access more oil, and will then probably just leak out again because let’s face the oil industry has a terrible record of plugging methane leaking from wells.

Mining for #eletricvehicles has much less environmental destruction than oil and you only gotta mine it once.

The old cowboys managed with no vehicle, I’m sure they’d be overjoyed with an #F150Lightning. Range 255 - 320 miles , will tow anything and you can run your house off of it.

Replying to Avatar Keith

Good morning! Tea or coffee, the same principle applies. We don’t live in climates where coffee/tea grows naturally. It has to be transported thousands of miles and requires special packaging and storage. That tea bag started as a tree that was harvested by a man with a gas powered chainsaw, moved with heavy equipment to a truck where it was shipped to a mill and processed using more heavy machinery, toxic chemicals and dozens of people that drove to work that day. That’s just to make the paper for the teabags. Now apply that thinking to everything you eat. Packaging is one of the biggest parts of everyone’s carbon footprint that is most often ignored.

Cut fuel use by 50%? Most of my food comes without packaging! More like cut fuel use by 1000%

Beef has such a high carbon footprint because it is imported, fed manufactured food and processed in a factory. Try buying a grass fed animal from a local farmer and having it processed by a local butcher. You will support your local economy, get healthier food and actually remove carbon from your footprint. Here in the states we had 30,000,000 buffalo roaming the plains before they were ignorantly slaughtered. Large, grass fed ruminants, when farmed on a savanna type landscape actually help remove carbon from the air and put it in the soil where it belongs. Cows don’t have a bad carbon footprint, how we raise them does.

Thanks for the kind words about the farm. It’s been a lifelong dream that took me 28 years to realize. The goal is to be as self sufficient as possible. I don’t ā€œsellā€anything from my farm. Selling invites regulations and government. We trade with other people in our community. For example, recently I traded eggs from my chickens for a bushel of blueberries, traded meat for butter. Last year I produced 1000lbs of food for me and my wife, all in a way that removes carbon from the air. Traded the surplus and returned the excess to the land.

That’s why I asked for a debate. Most people, just like the app you suggested, don’t take lifestyle into account. Sure, I drive an F150 a few thousand miles a year, but I’ll put that carbon up against the carbon emissions for the packaging required for a week’s worth of the average person’s groceries. I believe that on an annual basis my actions result in a net negative carbon footprint. My truck isn’t evil and I wouldn’t be able to lead the life I live without it.

Tea & Coffee.

Well, supply chains sound immense, but economies of scale reduce these to very little which I’m sure is factored in the APP.

While driving over to the neighbouring farm to swap goods in your #Ford #F150 may burn half a gallon of #gas.

Every gallon of fuel used makes ā‰ˆ 3 x its weight in COā‚‚

3.140 kgCOā‚‚ / litre Gas / Petrol

3.310 kgCOā‚‚ / litre #Diesel

Then there is getting the fuel to the vehicle (well to tank) this adds 30% . So now your Litre of gas is 4.082 kg

Like the Buffalo, grass fed is great because it’s a natural part of the carbon cycle. It doesn’t require fossil input unlike intense grain fed.

I get the whole American truck thing & it’s great you actually use it to full potential (instead of city folk grocery shopping), but I’m guessing the app has said about 5 tonnes COā‚‚ just for your vehicle alone ?

I would suggest an #electric #van preferably combined with #solar as an alternative. This would drop 5 tonnes COā‚‚ to <1 Tonne.

https://www.parkers.co.uk/vans-pickups/best/electric-vans/

That’s awesome low impact farming! It looks like you’re doing it in the best way possible. (I’m no expert in farming emissions)

It’s the burning of fossil fuels that really drive up your footprint. Cars, flying, heating & electricity.

Is the farming for personal, business or both ?

If 50% of Vehicle mileage is for the business I’d half your personal vehicle annual mileage in the app.

Meat has a footprint. Beef is the worst. But the F150 will be the bigger part of your footprint.

My footprint is 2.4 tonnes CO2/ year . I do not count my business emissions, like a bus driver would not count the bus emissions.

Replying to Avatar Peter Gerstbach

Here it is, another post about my journey to becoming a pilot! #LearningToFly

In my previous post, I mentioned that the desire to learn how to fly has been with me since childhood. However, recent concerns about the CO2 impact of flying made me pause and reevaluate my dream. I've taken steps to reduce my personal carbon footprint and fly less frequently. Considering that aviation is responsible for approximately 2% of CO2 emissions, it's essential to weigh this impact. Interestingly, only 5 to 10 percent of the Earth's population takes flights within a year, which highlights the imbalance. These thoughts led me to reconsider my long-held aspiration of becoming a pilot.

But then, quite serendipitously, I discovered that a local flying school has one of the first electric aircraft in its fleet: the Pipistrel Velis. This remarkable aircraft was the first fully electric type certified aircraft by the EASA (European Union Aviation Safety Agency) in June 2020.

Shortly after learning about this, my wife convinced me that the time was right, and she enrolled me in the flight school. :-)

Last week marked my fourth session, the third of which was on the Velis, and I must say it's truly amazing. It bears a striking resemblance to an electric car: no fumes, no loud noises (unlike flying with combustion engines that require noise-canceling headphones to communicate with your co-pilot), and no vibrations at all. The freedom of flying without the distractions of a combustion engine beside you is exhilarating.

The only drawback: Electric aircrafts are not yet suited for extensive A to B transport. The Velis has a flight time of approximately 50 minutes. During flight training, you initially focus on the "circuit": taking off from and landing at your airfield, conducting rounds in the vicinity. Much practice in this pattern is required before attempting landings at different airfields. So it is well suited for flight schools.

With this groundbreaking aircraft, I'll managed to halve my emissions during flight school, and I find that truly inspiring! To pioneer new endeavors, someone has to take the first step. I'm grateful that Pipistrel developed this electric aircraft, thrilled that my flight school offers it, and I am excited to participate in this electrified future of aviation!

On a related note, numerous electric aircraft are in development, set to allow A-B flights with extended ranges. I'll delve into these advancements another time.

So, what are your thoughts? Do you believe electric aviation is the future?

For those who've contemplated learning to fly, what factors have deterred you from pursuing it?

If you're a pilot, what motivated you to embrace aviation?

I'm eager to hear your thoughts!

This is me during my first session with the Velis:

https://gerstbach.at/images/2023/2023-06-16_10-18-22_CR6_4746_Velis.webp

#aviation #AviationCommunity #PilotLife #airplanes #aircrafts

Pleased to hear you’re taking you personal footprint seriously.

I’ve never seen them in person but have seen them on the Fully Charged Show…

https://youtu.be/YdfYXlUK6is?feature=shared

#Tesla Model 3 vs #Ford #F150

Bitmain S9’s are waaay down the list now. I think they’re run more for nostalgic reasons.

https://www.bitcoinpowerconsumption.info/jthash.html

I have the lowest #carbon #footprint.

Who’s got the highest ?

Get the app

https://www.earthhero.org/en_GB/

Can’t hide replies in NOSTR šŸ˜

Replying to cc89a173...

Here's an angry, bitter rant about colonialism by Indi Samarajiva that really resonates with me...

_________________________________

"Why Renewables Won’t End Environmental Destruction"

Colonialism began with renewable energy: wind to sail across the world, solar to grow cash crops, and human blood, sweat, and tears to grow them. By this logic, you could say that early colonialism was ā€˜sustainable’ but it obviously wasn’t. Because the problem isn’t the energy source, it’s what you use that energy for.

Colonialism actively destroyed natural ecosystems to plant cash mono-crops. They brutally hunted land cousins for their skin and ocean cousins for their bodily oils, bringing many species to the brink of extinction, and quite a few over it. To accomplish this without energy slaves, they trafficked human slaves across the world, leaving millions at the bottom of the ocean.

Colonialism both actively and passively spread disease across the world, leading to genocidal levels of depopulation. Then of course there was the outright killing, raping, and stealing.

Most perniciously, they framed all this as ā€˜progress’ and ā€˜civilization’, which is still the frame we live in. We call this ongoing process ā€˜capitalism’ or ā€˜development’ now, but it’s the same thing — destroying the natural world to make artificial profits. The truth is that colonialism never ended. We’re still in it, just with different branding.

Today we think we can switch from ripping coal and oil out of the Earth, and just rip out lithium and copper instead. But ā€˜renewable’ rape does not change the fundamental raping going on. An electric bulldozer rips up the earth as much as a diesel one.

The process of exploitation might change names and change colors, but the process remains the same. Early colonialism started with renewable energy and late capitalism is ending there. There’s nothing new under the sun, not even ā€˜renewables’. I’ll repeat myself because history repeats. Same shit, different day.

_________________________________

FULL ESSAY -- https://indica.medium.com/why-renewables-wont-end-environmental-destruction-2c3ee480705e

#Environment #Climate #ClimateChange #Colonialism #Capitalism #Pollution

Your a fake GFY