Nostr Web Client

I think what's odd is how common it would be for the male to get caught up in her response - or how common it would be for people to empathize with him here. I might have myself some years back.

But ulitmately what's happening (that matters - I could be wrong...but assuming based on context clues):

Reporter asking her a question:

Her responding

Him interrupting

Her enforcing boundary

Getting caught up on the language and labeling her negatively seems a failure here...it's not about what she says, it's just that she enforces the boundary.

nostr:nprofile1qyt8wumn8ghj7ct5d3shxtnwdaehgu3wd3skueqpz4mhxue69uhk2er9dchxummnw3ezumrpdejqqgrn3au88tpvdjmhq8332psk4lyzgdumzv45v7a94ppf6kty4ud3xcnt2h0l How would you enforce a boundary in a moment where you had an important opportunity to speak and it was being interrupted?

nostr:nprofile1qyw8wumn8ghj7cmgwf5hxarsd9kxctnwdaehgu339e3k7mf0qyt8wumn8ghj7etyv4hzumn0wd68ytnvv9hxgtcqyzmul86z57ttpy0gg0wwjxwnaaxqmjpwq2299m0shk7daw0vhyl8s06rj7w I'd love to hear your take on the vid.

freemymind 🇨🇭 9mo ago

I love how you summarized it:

"Reporter asking her a question:

Her responding

Him interrupting

Her enforcing boundary"

I think my argument is the same or similar as your one.

The main point was your summary. And then there are so many people, who are angry about how she enforces her boundaries seems unfair.

I feel to live in a balanced freedom-focused world, first offenders need to be stopped first. Analizing whatever reaction should be a secondary task.

And why would one defend this man in such a situation. Is everyone assuming he is a snowflake with no selfesteem? I think he is totally fine taking this critique. Based on his behavior it was maby not strong enought, since he just got on talking.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

tee 9mo ago

curious to hear your thoughts on "first offenders need to be stopped first'. I think you're saying something like "stop a problem as soon as you see it's a problem".

Also, when you say "he got on talking" you mean when he said "You're a winner", or went on talking to someone else.

To take your question literally - I think people defending him see this about loyalty (for lack of a better word). To me it seems like the reporter maybe asked a question that more or less wasn't positive on the show, or that was the energy there...and Alec was attempting to promote/defend/uplift Hilaria....so they see her response as basically being mean to someone who was trying to support her.

freemymind 🇨🇭 9mo ago

Sidenote: Is there a problem with your client? I see your post twice.

This can be a thing, that people think as you say. I do not think, that means can legitimize actions. Therefor I see that he unrespectfully interfered in the interview. I really do not understand why many people seem to prefer complex objectively false analisis over directly looking at what happened.

It is a very natural escalation that was caused by Baldwin.

Isn't it just logical to resolve problems at their core?

tee 9mo ago

Probably. I'm fresh to nostr and still getting set up - LOL

If I understand you correctly I think many people speak to "worst case scenario" type conditions. Perhaps I'm engaging with that too much.

It seems people who believe a man has a certain place and a woman has a certain place have specific ideas of what a problem is, and what the core is....that's one of my understandings of it anyway.