But... why would anyone spend $56 Million on THIS?

https://www.yahoo.com/news/child-damages-56m-rothko-painting-232041257.html

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Reminds me of candy corn

Fiat art

and I thought that I couldn't draw! Gosh, I was wrong.

Humiliation ritual for legal money laundering

sounds like a scam 🀣

right?

yes but I don't understand it 🀣

It's the child's way of pointing out the emperor has no clothes.

According to the article the child only scratched the "painting" πŸ˜† At first I thought it had painted over actual art.

Because that’s how much it cost taxpayers in total

Money laundering.

Does this really deserve a news ?

We can say it is a "alive" paint. πŸ˜…

Even if the author didn't expect it.

It make me remind this :

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/watch-14-million-bansky-painting-shred-itself-soon-it-sold-180970486/

Art is like music you are not forced to like every form of art.

Money laundering

reasonable. I wouldn't put this up in my garage let alone inside the house.

SameπŸ˜…

Cause its scarce LOL