Nostr is not hard consensus, it doesn't need to be Either/Or.
We can have MLS group chats, Omemo DMs, etc...
Nostr is not hard consensus, it doesn't need to be Either/Or.
We can have MLS group chats, Omemo DMs, etc...
Say goodbye to interoperability then ๐ข
I'd say Nostr is about exploring what is possible once the user take ownership of its cryptography.
the NIP repo is a free market of idea built around this predicate. Interoperability will happen naturally around the best ideas.
It is a free market of ideas indeed. But if competing choices persist for many years, like three types of DM systems or two ways of doing git, then interoperability between those clients is totally lost.
Eventually a clearer standard full of the most optimized choices should be established to regain that universal compatibility.
I think weโre getting closer to being able to map out that new standard thanks to all the experimentation that has occurred over the last couple years.
the best systems will emerge, I agree it is a bit of a chaos, especially in DMs, but it's being figured out and we'll see what nostriches prefers.
All protocols are hard consensus if you want interoperability. Standardization leads to universal compatibility across clients.