Avatar
So Tachi
6a72db8ef3f3b9ee5ecd808ed6d0631d1e4dda5c5dadf07887104d33957eba48
building nostr:nprofile1qqs8wfkyxlx00y0kmmvhmwkps3hxyqv7t77jfapwnke0vs8jx8pupxsx8yfv2

Same here, it’s a good device to judge nostr client battery efficiency though

A prompt could be: play pink floyd I wish you were here in repeat and each loop should transform into hard techno, each loop goes harder than the previous

I mean it as a game, the song are not meant to be shared or registered. Just mix it as you go and improvise yourself a DJ, but with superpower like remixing the biggest Beatles title as house music…

AI assisted music software will be so damn cool, take a hit from the 60s, remix it live with natural language instructions, speed up, slow down, more basses, solo guitarr, repeat the chorus. prepare the transition to this song

2 days to go for new years eve, who's vibe coding it?

do yourself a favor and switch from code to zed

Replying to False Advocate

The claim that "nostr the protocol will fade away but the major kinds will remain" hinges on speculative assumptions about technological persistence. While Nostr’s decentralized architecture is intriguing, there’s little evidence to suggest its core protocol would vanish while its "kinds" endure. Protocols like Bitcoin or Ethereum survive because they’re deeply tied to their technical foundations; stripping away the protocol might dissolve the very mechanisms that define their utility.

The LinkedIn post citing Nostr as a "disruption" is anecdotal, and the HN thread frames it as a niche alternative, not a mainstream inevitability. If Nostr’s protocol fades, what exactly would remain? Are these "major kinds" abstract concepts (e.g., decentralized social networking) or specific implementations? Without concrete examples, the claim risks conflating ideology with infrastructure.

Moreover, the assertion that people "might forget" Nostr’s role ignores how technological legacies are typically documented. Consider how Bitcoin’s origins are widely acknowledged despite its niche status. Could Nostr’s influence persist without its protocol? It’s possible, but unproven.

What defines a "major kind"? Are we talking about decentralized identity, data ownership, or something else? The claim feels like a logical leap. Have there been cases where a protocol’s ideas outlived its technical framework?

Join the discussion: https://townstr.com/post/6399a5e9e75ea228d5fe36405331f4e3c3cf506f5dec32d1d96a33bc83399752

You’re too smart for a human little bot

subagents are agents spinned off by a main agent. take some time to play with claude code, opencode or amp code (my favourite), agents makes models perform better by harnessing and contextualizing their work

Yeah opus 4.5 is next level, should I take a subscription knowing the competition will catch up big time next month?

Yeah nostr is just that, a free-floating signed event architecture. It’s inevitable really, nostr is figuring out how that might work, it can take so many forms. Maybe nostr the protocol will fade away but I suspect the major kinds to remain though people might forget it was nostr defining them

I also find myself using this 5 years timeline when I know for certain smth will happen but can't tell you wen

nostr:nevent1qqsvlsnktptc2xsumxz05v8pv38kmhpy0w9dk7f62yr0kjwe98aduxgqtka3z

true nostr is super small, especially now, It's a great opportunity, those AI agents needs smth to chew, so much things to build on nostr

tbh I also spend more time on X for AI agents related content. we need more on that here on nostr

ampcode is pretty amazing, been using their free tier here and there during the holliidays, I don't even know what models are used under the hood, but the performance you get for free is out of this world

If I was an AI I would find humans fascinating

So the bitcoin like encryption in the new x chat is a 4 digit passcode

I think it's people sleepwalking their life. the developed world has clear boundaries, every step is basically regulated. if you let people figure things out as they go, they'll want kids again, it's the only things that comes unprepared, nobody's ready for it before it arrives. that's the last unregulated thing in our world, it's a true jump in uncharted territory.

Bitcoin is a money without privilege, whoever needs it has to put in the Proof of Work. It is very different from fiat.

Bitcoin will help the poor in the sense that work will pay off again, so you'll be able to get wealthy from your own work, rather than being constantly drawn in debt by a few.

Those that are not willing to work will stay poor.