When I look at clients, I always check DNS records most often times its cloudflare (the worst of the bunch) or heltzer which isn't much better. Is it possible for the developers to build a nostr CDN? Or a peer2peer version like IPFS? I think these will help contributed to freedom Tech.
#asknostr
#askadev
I feel like cloudflare has positioned themselves in a way that makes the pros outweigh the cons. Cons that they created ofcourse
IPFS is p2p, the yes got to be a way to devs to make this happen.
Nostr is already decentralized, so no need for CDN or like IPFS. Now, a way to organize and publish nodes, maybe.
As for DNS issues, lokinet and ENS are options. DNS registry is a bit of a pain in general.
Just for my own knowledge or awareness, why is Cloudflare the worst or bad? 0.0
Browser finger printing
Using DNS is retarded for a censorship resistant network
I was referring to CDN..
How is a CDN gonna work over Tor?
I know its possible became their are cloudflare relays here that many of u guys are using. U can enable it to allow TOR. If it can be done for relays surely for something like a IPFS site
It's not possible because you will not pay for it.
I think it can be funded. Freedom tech development doesn't mean free
Raise the funds first, then ask. Need enough Filecoin for IPFS to be viable. Need more crypto for development. Jack's $1M already dried up.
Filecoin is retardedly cheap. 0.02 for 100-200years storage
So buy it. Give away storage to devs and users for free to promote freedom.
Idk what point you're trying to make but what I'm getting from these words is you sound kinda like a capitalist. Are you?
Proposition: Filecoin is cheap. Freedom is important
Argument: buy cheap Filecoin to support freedom
I don't know what you mean by capitalist. I also don't care how you label me.
The argument only makes sense as a redistribution of capital, but it's not being framed that way
The poor buying each other filecoin because filecoin is cheap wouldn't make much sense - the poor can't afford extra of something just because it's cheap, and the demand would drive up the price for the same people trying to help each other afford it
I can't tell if you're saying the rich should buy filecoin for the poor, or being sardonic
Are you saying, you would if you could?
I can. Pay me. Fund the servers and equipment.
Opensats just got 21mil, why cannot ask them? They're supposedly support freedomtech
Cause I don't care, and I don't wanna talk to lightning retards.
Surely they'll pay on-chain
Go pitch your idea. I'll start development when the transaction settles.
I'm not a developers, would they even listen? >.< but I'll definitely ask.
Don't you get it? Funding devs is easy. Raising funds is hard. If you can't raise funds or write code and maintain servers, don't bother with any proposals, they'll never be done.
Better idea: propose ideal functionality, having considered how it should work, as the basis for criticizing shitty dev work
Do you think the Nostr project overall wasted a lot of funding on shitty dev work?
Funding dev work this far into overshoot is always a waste that results in shitty quality. Good devs haven't worked for pay up front since like, Satoshi Nakamoto or so
Don't use the pseudonym. Unless you don't know the real names behind it. Then, lol hahah
Not many people believe me that it was Satoru Iwata
No. Adam Back and Hal Finny. And others who contributed to the code.
I don't see what makes you think that. Satoru Iwata seems much more likely
Do you know anything about hashcash and PGP? Just back away from this argument now. You have already demonstrated your ignorance in the field of cryptography.
I'll be nice and pretend I didn't notice you.
Satoru Iwata seems to have had a more utilitarian understanding of cryptography. Hashcash is too silly and pgp is too simple for either to be indicators of Bitcoin level genius. Satoshi's code also seems a little too clean for him to be more than 1 person
Hashcash is the first ref in the white paper. Style and structure analysis of the code base show that Finney as the closest match. He was also the one to made the first transaction.
Please, stop being retarded.
Why would you reference yourself first from a pseudonym?
Finney himself described Satoshi as someone else sending him that transaction, not himself, and I see Satoru Iwata style/structure in that code
Can you two stop fighting? If you wanna fight hash it over who had better software, code, security or design.
