he’s a persuasive guy for sure
but he’s a lawyer, and his evidence supports his cases, which he has litigated and where he had to play down, discredit or otherwise dismiss opposing evidence
lawyers aren’t interested in the truth
interesting guy but i’m taking what he has to say with a huge grain of salt
Same can be said about any other politician, scientist,…. All huge third party interests and money involved.
Not a strong argument imo
☝️
especially politicians and corporate interests, no doubt
i just apply the same skepticism to his claims. a lot of people, including joe rogan, seem to discard that skepticism because he’s challenging the status quo
Seems people forget Julius Caesar resisted the status quo as well. He was also good at pulling support from the impoverished lower classes.
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed