So the US/German/France/Britain have told Ukraine they are now allowed to strike deep into Russia, no more restrictions on the use of Western supplied missiles.

In any normal situation, if country A and B are at war with each other, and countries C, D, and E supply weapons to country A, country B does not retaliate aginst countries C, D and E. That is, supplying weapons isn't the same thing as waging war. Normally weapons suppliers would not put any restrictions in place (except maybe "don't fire these at me!")

And Western news would have you believe this about Ukraine and Russia. That Germany, France, Britain and the US are just supplying weapons.

But most people already know this is a stretch. We read about the CIA bases along the Russian border in the NY Times. We have heard about targetting assistance from the West. We know that Ukraine and NATO have been tight since the 1990s, doing military drills together all this time, practicing to fight Russia. We know there are boots on the ground in unofficial capacity. And the economic sanctions are also a form of war. Russia knows all this and more.

The West giving Ukraine permission to make long-range strikes into Russia with their weapons is just another escalatory step. It doesn't mean we will soon see Russia striking into other Western nations. I think Russia will retaliate in a different way (I have no specific prediction). But escalation has a way of getting out of control, and every escalatory step is dangerous.

I suspect Russia has retaliated to previous escalation by covertly supporting Ansar Allah in Yemen via Iran. How else would the poorest people in the world have hypersonics to fire at Ben Gurion airport? Russia threatened this, the West ignored it, and Russia seems to have kept their word.

No one in Russia ever had any illusions about the West's so-called "permissions". Putin himself has repeatedly stated that all of Ukraine's actions — whether missile strikes on Russian targets or military operations on Russian territory — are carried out with the permission and full support of NATO countries.

In Russia, our own propaganda has prepared us for the idea that any NATO weapon, including nuclear ones, could be used against us. Just last year, we were being "warmed up" with nuclear threats — whether it was a dirty bomb explosion, an accident at a nuclear facility, or the use of a tactical nuclear warhead.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Yeah I don't know who they think they are fooling.

I wish you safety.

You know, there is a single extremely simple step for rusians to be safe - just withdraw their own army from foreign countries and they will be ultra safe.

So why would you wish them would they intentionally do not want?

Well, that's the same old story about NATO being a defensive alliance, even though throughout its entire history, the alliance has never actually defended itself — only attacked.