Thanks for clarifying! I'd say the first option seems the most probable *and* desirable, I can scarcely imagine how coming up with thousands of gradually improving versions of the same software system would be better than carefully planning an architecture and using whatever form of AI assistance to fill in the boring parts IMHO

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I agree. AI can help churn out code. If you have a good design, the software will be good even if AI generates more of the code than a human. If you don't have a good design, it's a crapshoot.