Unless I misunderstand NACK and ACK, assuming NACK for against and ACK being for. It would seem majority of reviewers are against it in some part, so not minority.

And I will say I'm not familiar with GitHub eitquette

But trying to bring to light a conflict of interest, once a post disclosing it was marked as off topic, that seems quite on topic to me ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

Also why can't I zap it you.....

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

You are correct. NACK means against.

I mean the usernames in each section give it away. But I was trying to air on the side of not sounding like I know everything, cause this technical stuff is a lot over my head.

I'm a left bell curve kinda guy. I know enough to run a node, play with some DLCs back in the day, thanks for that btw nostr:nprofile1qqswrlemlh2wgqc4jkds3d8ueqj9a2j3gcm7r48v9tskdd6rxsd7rtcprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuumwdae8gtnnda3kjctvqyf8wumn8ghj7ur4wfcxcetsv9njuetnqyw8wumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnzv4h8g6r9vdshymtpdchxxmmduzd0zn. And I try to stay informed where I can and the big thing I see here as a layman.

Right now I can set that arbitrary data limit on my node.

PR would remove that.

thought nostr:nprofile1qqstnem9g6aqv3tw6vqaneftcj06frns56lj9q470gdww228vysz8hqpzdmhxue69uhkzmr8duh82arcduhx7mn9qy2hwumn8ghj7etyv4hzumn0wd68ytnvv9hxgqgdwaehxw309ahx7uewd3hkcam28zl comment was poignant and the issue i think most non technical people have,

Honestly, Guy knocked it out of the park. If bitcoin survives, there should be statues for folks like him in future civilization.

This might help a bit, if you like visual stuff.

& thanks for running a node!

Yeah I was looking for this again, found it yesterday when trying to read up on everything. Thank you

Most of the nacks aren't contributors, just randoms from twitter

Trust the experts

So I can just NACK a PR?

Anyone can comment on a pr

Fixed my zaps