@npub180x9vv4yuagf2w3qzmuertvv46ccee6n0wp0yh3zcz7nhyqrmzuqzjmeh, I've actually thought of a question for you.
Magnetism, this big ball of molten iron that may or may not be at the center our spherical or not spherical "Thing" we all live on. Where does magnetism come from🤔? There's a whole host of shit that wouldn't work if it wasn't for magnetism, namely, all electronics🤷🏻♂️.
It's my favourite topic. Magnetism comes from the Aether.
The aether is everywhere at all times. It is pure potential, or energy at rest. Fields are modalities of the aether, just like liquid, ice and steam are modalities of water, mediated through pressure and temperature.
The fundamental modalities of the aether are:
1. Dielectricity
2. Magnetism
3. Electricity
4. 'gravity', which is an effect of electricity, or an antifield.
Dielectricity is the engine of magnetism, where you have magnetism, you will always have the dielectric field powering it. Dielectricity manifests as hyperboloid (hourglass shape) geometry, and magnetism is always toroidal geometry. They are the inverse of eachother, imagine a donut (magnetism) with an hourglass (dielectricity) in the middle of it.
Dielectricity and magnetism coupled with movement through space results in electricity. Magnets accelerate towards eachother because of nature's tendency towards favouring a state of rest, i.e. there is no such thing as magnetic attraction, rather, it is dielectric acceleration towards rest or counterspace.
We have never dug deeper than ~8 miles. There is no molten core or whatever they made up, there is no evidence for the claim and no possible way they could know what's beyond that depth.
Wow, that's an incredibly detailed reply. I'm gonna have to dissect it, while sober. That time, is not now😬😂🫡.
Ok. I'm still lucid, why haven't we dug deeper than 8 miles🤔? Some place in Russia as I understand. Why do things get hotter the deeper we dig🤔? And it's not just mechanical heat of the drilling bits.....
Aaaaaaand, if the Earth is flat. How flat🤔? Clearly more than 8 miles "Flat".
How flat and why does it get hotter the more deep we penetrate the flatness😜.
These are things we don't know. The only reason I begrudgingly maintain this position is because there is no measurable curvature.
Aaaaaah come on man. Even if I agree with you about the curvature debate(I don't), there are other metrics, like I've just raised with you which you can't debunk. You can't debunk them because they are widely believed to be, and are probably, true🤷🏻♂️.
I've had my eyes opened to A LOT of things over the years, and like you, I'll always have an open mind, but certain things are just, patently true. Modern vaccines are bullshit and a pharmaceutical industry complex construct. Central banking is a scam, the globe is fucking round though🙏🏻🎉🎉🎉🫡.
Do you not see the fallacies in your argument? Vaccines are widely believed to be safe and effective, does that make it true? Consensus is proof of nothing, and you're open minded enough from what I gather, that this should be another thing that will open your eyes.
The globe, with the claimed diameter, HAS to have a certain rate of curvature. 8 inches per mile squared is a simple enough formula to use. At 35 miles, there should be 200m of curvature obstruction at an observer height of 6 feet. Feel free to pull up an online calculator and verify this, then try and reconcile the obvious evidence.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FUuOmNIZQP4
This is the simplest bit of cognitive dissonance to overcome. Next month FE will start picking up more steam when some big accounts host some debates on it and bring it further into the mainstream. Problem is the priests of the globe are scared to debate people who know their model, so finding credentialed PHDs who aren't afraid is difficult. Heliocentrism is a philosophy. Did you know that Newton's Principia had pages removed which prove he admitted this? Now why would these sorts of admissions be removed in the first place?
Ken Wheeler explains it here:
