Get ahead of Elon by watching Praxgirl https://images.app.goo.gl/q9u59PtuwAneLQXR6
Discussion
These are brilliant! Will watch them again, worth every minute
š
I rather watch her then Elon, that's for sure.
I've learn something today, thanks !
Watching this as a bust my ass on my hobbie š¤
Human action is purposeful, and the purpose is gene transmission. We know thisā¦
Praxeology is fundamentally missing the boat because of a false premise found in lesson 2. People CAN be quantified by the purpose of gene transmission through gender role conformity to serve as an individual mating strategy for the transmission of their genes. 1:1 sex ratio is a cultural constant and inborn as a result because gender roles are an attractive division of labor and inform the differences in males and females of all sexual speciesā.
Individuals CANNOT be predicted because the concept of āindividualā is not based in reality. There is no such thing as āindividualsā in sexual species. This concept is man-made and an incredibly ignorant.
The idea that individuals have the capacity to ālearn and chooseāis also wrong. The free will debate is very silly. Free will only exists if there is an individual sacrifice being made. An individual cannot make a choice outside of the framework of their social or cultural environment, unless they are making an individual sacrifice, otherwise they are just acting out of self interest. A choice is not a choice if it is a determinant outcome of self interest which can be in favor of family in-group out to polar political in-group. Everyone who is acting in self interest can be observed as acting in a determinant fashion.
āThe uniqueness of all individuals is the logical necessary starting point for studying human behaviorā¦..ā
Praxeology is carefully crafted nonsenseā¦.
All content informs but seriously⦠if this is the starting point, what is even the point..?
Humans are not individuals⦠humans are an incredibly ignorant species to have constructed such a semantic framework for social dynamics.
The so called scientists of the natural sciences are just as stupid as the notion that the uniqueness of individuals is the logical starting point for the study of human behavior.
How about we put forth a truth claim that actually holds water�??
I am here to interact with the best and brightest on the internet.
Where is everyone?
@jack. Engagement is everything. Letās have a discussion and we will solve defi and social together.
Biology is completely inappropriate⦠what sort of woke garbage is this? The action axiom is utter horseshit. Humans acting purposefully to achieve their desired ends is just another way of saying humans are self interested⦠Praxeology is a shity rebrand of Moloch as a positive. What a joke.
Stop swearing. It makes you look unintelligent.
Lol. Fuck off. Use of colourful language has no correlation to one's intelligence. You just sound overly sensitive.
You can hear type? Fascinating!
Just like you can claim that text makes "you LOOK unintelligent"
LOL.
What are we even doing here? We all want the same thing! Why arenāt we discussing the deeper issues? We are all in this together.
Predictability is definitely a silly undertaking with infinite individual variability, as was said in the videos. That is a positive assertion. My issue is when content is made and circulated that isnāt getting to the heart of things. Letās be constructive.
![]()
you two assholes sound like a pair of dumb fucking cunts.
https://www.sciencealert.com/swearing-is-a-sign-of-more-intelligence-not-less-say-scientists