Nostr Web Client

Luke says CSAM in particular can insta-kill Bitcoin overnight.

So unless you think filters work 100% — which is obviously not the case, as can be seen even in the image you just shared — your reply doesn’t address the question. (Of course I wouldn’t expect it to, because you’re in category 2 of my OP: https://primal.net/e/nevent1qqs27gg24v7yv7puukjvmxwr0qhp5pslw5kxg6ckztupq8wnmpr4x6s3qqy4h)

BitcoinIsFuture 2mo ago

You don't think it leads to problems?

"The person who shared child sexual abuse on BSV reportedly did so by uploading the image to their Money Button transaction, which was then added to the digital block of data on the immutable ledger. Money Button confirmed that this was the case in a blog post on Friday, stating that its service doesn’t have a way to “interpret or display” the content it processes, but BitcoinFiles.org does, and was notified by local authorities that there was illegal content on its site. Money Button wrote that “BitcoinFiles.org removed the content from their website and then contacted us suspecting that Money Button may have been the tool the criminals used to write this content to the blockchain”"

"The payment processor added that it updated its terms of service “to explicitly clarify that Money Button cannot be used to write illegal content to the blockchain, and users who attempt to do so will be banned and reported to the authorities.”"

https://gizmodo.com/someone-uploaded-child-pornography-to-a-blockchain-ledg-1832398480

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Aaron van Wirdum 2mo ago

It may lead to problems.

Just like it may lead (and could always have lead) to problems that you can embed this stuff in Inscriptions, >100kb OP_RETURNs, fake pubkeys, etc etc.

I do not think there is a moral or legal difference between these different methods. Do you?

BitcoinIsFuture 2mo ago

Not it may.

It will. If you check the article you will see that authorities were involved.

There is a huge moral and legal issue. CSAM is just disgusting exploitation of children.

Aaron van Wirdum 2mo ago

Do you think it makes a difference if these images are embedded in OP_RETURNS, Inscriptions, or fake pubkeys?

BitcoinIsFuture 2mo ago

Nick Szabo already answered that.

Also the compromised Core devs did not fix inscriptions intentionally.

They are fixed in Bitcoin Knots though which I am running.

nostr:nevent1qqsp8xcjfzwnj8huaymzr0s033h94gp8ha43vef55nsdspg3f2nnw2gppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qy08wumn8ghj7mn0wd68yttsw43zuam9d3kx7unyv4ezumn9wshsz8thwden5te0dehhxarj9e3xjarrda5kuetj9eek7cmfv9kz7e4vc5c

Aaron van Wirdum 2mo ago

Szabo is wrong: If more data is included in the OP_RETURN “bucket”, it *does* in fact mean that less data can fit into the Inscriptions “bucket” since all of it still has to fit within the same block weight limit. (75% less even!)

But you’ve now resorted to outsourcing your thinking again instead of answering my question, so I’ll end the conversation here.

BitcoinIsFuture 2mo ago

E = mc2, yes I have accepted Einsteins thinking. Great argument.

You or anyone saying that Nicck Szabo is wrong on this issue is dishonest and pathetic.