stolen from nostr:nprofile1qqsvak4cr0jzaarahhn98a9602e94sa2xt8u9dnjac8cns86lzp0z0spp4mhxue69uhkyunz9e5k7tcpr9mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuumwdae8gtnnda3kjctv9uq32amnwvaz7tmwdaehgu3wdau8gu3wv3jhvtcw9estc

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

XOnly are bad?

big mistake...

Starting my crypto trading journey has been an incredible experience, especially with the guidance of my manager’s new trading plan. The financial progress I’ve made is beyond what I expected earning $150,000 is a great milestone for someone new to this space. The support from the company has been outstanding. If you're looking to get started, I highly recommend reaching out to Mrs. Susan. You can email her at susandemorirs@gmail.com or message her on WhatsApp at +1 (472) 218-4301. She’s been instrumental in my success

I don‘t understand the what the differentiation between men and women here is supposed to be

I think the men-women part was layer1 of the original meme but we're already at layer 69 of this meme and the original meaning was left behind many layers ago

ok so since you‘ve mentioned layers of meaning, in this case there is a denotation layer (men‘s desire for stripping formatting data to access raw key) and a connotation layer (the contrast between men wanting to do something that‘s meaningful to society or has historical impact while women‘s desires are domestic and, in this context, dumb or meaningless). in structural linguistics, this layer of meaning belongs to something called „signified“. my point being: you interchanging whatever male intention on top of the 2nd panel, does not remove the original layer that implies that women‘s desires are mundane and irrelevant compared to men‘s. and that‘s kind of a dickhead idea to reproduce.